Abstract
Given a tournament T, a Banks winner of T is the first vertex of any maximal (with respect to inclusion) transitive subtournament of T; a Slater winner of T is the first vertex of any transitive tournament at minimum distance of T (the distance being the number of arcs to reverse in T to make T transitive). In this note, we show that there exists a tournament with 16 vertices for which no Slater winner is a Banks winner. This counterexample improves the previous one, due to G. Laffond and J.-F. Laslier, which has 75 vertices.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 211-215 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | Discrete Applied Mathematics |
| Volume | 80 |
| Issue number | 2-3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 11 Dec 1997 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A 16-vertex tournament for which Banks set and Slater set are disjoint'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver