TY - JOUR
T1 - A comparative study of the impact of Mo and stainless steel substrates on the properties of Cu(In,Ga)Se2 based solar cells
AU - Stanley, Mishael
AU - Jubault, Marie
AU - Gaiaschi, Sofia
AU - Tempez, Agnès
AU - Donsanti, Frédérique
AU - Naghavi, Negar
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2019/2/1
Y1 - 2019/2/1
N2 - Metallic substrates are well suited for the deposition conditions of Cu(Inx,Ga1-x)Se2 (CIGS) solar cells due to their high temperature tolerance. In this work, Molybdenum (Mo) and stainless steel substrates were used in CIGS cell fabrication. Mo foil can be utilized as both the substrate and back contact in the cells. On the other hand, stainless steel despite requiring an impurity barrier layer and back contact deposition, remains economically more interesting. The CIGS absorbers were deposited on the metallic substrates in a 3-stage process at 480 °C. Due to the low deposition temperature, no impurity barrier layer was applied on the stainless steel substrates. For the same deposition conditions, the absorbers on the Mo substrates had a lower [Ga]/[Ga] + [In] ratio (GGI) of 0,24 as compared to 0,28 on the stainless steel substrates. Although the same absorber deposition process was applied to both substrate types, the highest efficiency of 14,0% was recorded on the Mo substrates.
AB - Metallic substrates are well suited for the deposition conditions of Cu(Inx,Ga1-x)Se2 (CIGS) solar cells due to their high temperature tolerance. In this work, Molybdenum (Mo) and stainless steel substrates were used in CIGS cell fabrication. Mo foil can be utilized as both the substrate and back contact in the cells. On the other hand, stainless steel despite requiring an impurity barrier layer and back contact deposition, remains economically more interesting. The CIGS absorbers were deposited on the metallic substrates in a 3-stage process at 480 °C. Due to the low deposition temperature, no impurity barrier layer was applied on the stainless steel substrates. For the same deposition conditions, the absorbers on the Mo substrates had a lower [Ga]/[Ga] + [In] ratio (GGI) of 0,24 as compared to 0,28 on the stainless steel substrates. Although the same absorber deposition process was applied to both substrate types, the highest efficiency of 14,0% was recorded on the Mo substrates.
KW - Copper Indium Gallium Selenide
KW - Molybdenum foil
KW - Solar Cells
KW - Stainless Steel
U2 - 10.1016/j.tsf.2018.12.027
DO - 10.1016/j.tsf.2018.12.027
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85058944615
SN - 0040-6090
VL - 671
SP - 6
EP - 11
JO - Thin Solid Films
JF - Thin Solid Films
ER -