TY - GEN
T1 - A comprehensive comparison of chassis systems coordination approaches
AU - Kissai, Moad
AU - Monsuez, Bruno
AU - Martinez, Didier
AU - Mouton, Xavier
AU - Tapus, Adriana
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© ICROS.
PY - 2018/12/10
Y1 - 2018/12/10
N2 - One of the main concerns of automotive industry is autonomous vehicles. Not only equipment suppliers but also new entering actors are racing to develop safer automotive systems. Consequently, the car manufacturer has to integrate different systems to control the same vehicle. This paper discusses the different architectures adopted to handle chassis systems interactions. Several car manufacturers study the influence of each system on the overall vehicle. They then add an additional coordination layer downstream the different systems to mitigate their possible conflicts. Here we propose a new approach that consists on managing systems interaction upstream the different systems. Coordination is based on control allocation techniques that take into account several vehicle states to find optimal commands distribution. Both approaches have been compared. Simulations showed the benefits that could offer the upstream approach in terms of safety and flexibility. The relevance of this approach is expected to grow with the increasing number of chassis systems.
AB - One of the main concerns of automotive industry is autonomous vehicles. Not only equipment suppliers but also new entering actors are racing to develop safer automotive systems. Consequently, the car manufacturer has to integrate different systems to control the same vehicle. This paper discusses the different architectures adopted to handle chassis systems interactions. Several car manufacturers study the influence of each system on the overall vehicle. They then add an additional coordination layer downstream the different systems to mitigate their possible conflicts. Here we propose a new approach that consists on managing systems interaction upstream the different systems. Coordination is based on control allocation techniques that take into account several vehicle states to find optimal commands distribution. Both approaches have been compared. Simulations showed the benefits that could offer the upstream approach in terms of safety and flexibility. The relevance of this approach is expected to grow with the increasing number of chassis systems.
KW - Chassis systems coordination
KW - Control allocation architectures
KW - Over-actuated systems
KW - Tire modelling
KW - Vehicle motion control
KW - simulations simulations
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85060487191
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85060487191
T3 - International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems
SP - 351
EP - 356
BT - International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems
PB - IEEE Computer Society
T2 - 18th International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems, ICCAS 2018
Y2 - 17 October 2018 through 20 October 2018
ER -