TY - GEN
T1 - A Mathematical Runtime Analysis of the Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm III (NSGA-III)
AU - Wietheger, Simon
AU - Doerr, Benjamin
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Copyright held by the owner/author(s).
PY - 2024/7/14
Y1 - 2024/7/14
N2 - The Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II) is the most prominent multi-objective evolutionary algorithm for real-world applications. While it performs evidently well on bi-objective optimization problems, empirical studies suggest that it is less effective when applied to problems with more than two objectives. A recent mathematical runtime analysis confirmed this observation by proving that the NGSA-II for an exponential number of iterations misses a constant factor of the Pareto front of the simple m-objective OneMinMax problem when m ≥ 3.In this work, we provide the first mathematical runtime analysis of the NSGA-III, a refinement of the NSGA-II aimed at better handling more than two objectives. We prove that the NSGA-III with sufficiently many reference points - a small constant factor more than the size of the Pareto front, as suggested for this algorithm - computes the complete Pareto front of the 3-objective OneMinMax benchmark in an expected number of O(n log n) iterations. This result holds for all population sizes (that are at least the size of the Pareto front). It shows a drastic advantage of the NSGA-III over the NSGA-II on this benchmark.This paper for the Hot-off-the-Press track at GECCO 2024 summarizes the work Simon Wietheger and Benjamin Doerr. A mathematical runtime analysis of the Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm III (NSGA-III). In International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI 2023. 5657 - 5665, 2023. [15].
AB - The Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II) is the most prominent multi-objective evolutionary algorithm for real-world applications. While it performs evidently well on bi-objective optimization problems, empirical studies suggest that it is less effective when applied to problems with more than two objectives. A recent mathematical runtime analysis confirmed this observation by proving that the NGSA-II for an exponential number of iterations misses a constant factor of the Pareto front of the simple m-objective OneMinMax problem when m ≥ 3.In this work, we provide the first mathematical runtime analysis of the NSGA-III, a refinement of the NSGA-II aimed at better handling more than two objectives. We prove that the NSGA-III with sufficiently many reference points - a small constant factor more than the size of the Pareto front, as suggested for this algorithm - computes the complete Pareto front of the 3-objective OneMinMax benchmark in an expected number of O(n log n) iterations. This result holds for all population sizes (that are at least the size of the Pareto front). It shows a drastic advantage of the NSGA-III over the NSGA-II on this benchmark.This paper for the Hot-off-the-Press track at GECCO 2024 summarizes the work Simon Wietheger and Benjamin Doerr. A mathematical runtime analysis of the Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm III (NSGA-III). In International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI 2023. 5657 - 5665, 2023. [15].
KW - NSGA-III
KW - multi-objective optimization
KW - runtime analysis
KW - theory
U2 - 10.1145/3638530.3664062
DO - 10.1145/3638530.3664062
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85201945039
T3 - GECCO 2024 Companion - Proceedings of the 2024 Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference Companion
SP - 63
EP - 64
BT - GECCO 2024 Companion - Proceedings of the 2024 Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference Companion
PB - Association for Computing Machinery, Inc
T2 - 2024 Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference Companion, GECCO 2024 Companion
Y2 - 14 July 2024 through 18 July 2024
ER -