Abstract
A powerful and declarative means of specifying computations containing abstractions involves meta-level, universally quantified generic judgments. We present a proof theory for such judgments in which signatures are associated to each sequent (used to account for eigenvariables of the sequent) and to each formula in the sequent (used to account for generic variables locally scoped over the formula). A new quantifier, ▽, is introduced to explicitly manipulate the local signature. Intuitionistic logic extended with ▽ satisfies cut-elimination even when the logic is additionally strengthened with a proof theoretic notion of definitions. The resulting logic can be used to encode naturally a number of examples involving name abstractions, and we illustrate using the π-calculus and the encoding of object-level provability.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 118-127 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | Proceedings - Symposium on Logic in Computer Science |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jan 2003 |
| Event | 18th Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science - Ottawa, Ont., Canada Duration: 22 Jun 2003 → 25 Jun 2003 |
Keywords
- Generic judgments
- Higher-order abstract syntax
- Proof search
- Reasoning about operational semantics
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A proof theory for generic judgments: An extended abstract'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver