Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A proof theory for generic judgments: An extended abstract

Research output: Contribution to journalConference articlepeer-review

Abstract

A powerful and declarative means of specifying computations containing abstractions involves meta-level, universally quantified generic judgments. We present a proof theory for such judgments in which signatures are associated to each sequent (used to account for eigenvariables of the sequent) and to each formula in the sequent (used to account for generic variables locally scoped over the formula). A new quantifier, ▽, is introduced to explicitly manipulate the local signature. Intuitionistic logic extended with ▽ satisfies cut-elimination even when the logic is additionally strengthened with a proof theoretic notion of definitions. The resulting logic can be used to encode naturally a number of examples involving name abstractions, and we illustrate using the π-calculus and the encoding of object-level provability.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)118-127
Number of pages10
JournalProceedings - Symposium on Logic in Computer Science
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2003
Event18th Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science - Ottawa, Ont., Canada
Duration: 22 Jun 200325 Jun 2003

Keywords

  • Generic judgments
  • Higher-order abstract syntax
  • Proof search
  • Reasoning about operational semantics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A proof theory for generic judgments: An extended abstract'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this