Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Analysis of ELM stability with extended MHD models in JET, JT-60U and future JT-60SA tokamak plasmas

  • the JET contributors
  • , JT-60SA Research Unit
  • National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology
  • Culham Centre for Fusion Energy
  • Oak Ridge National Laboratory
  • KTH Royal Institute of Technology
  • CEA Cadarache
  • Technical University of Eindhoven
  • ITER
  • Culham Science Centre
  • Research Centre Julich
  • Institute for Plasma Research
  • Instituto Superior Técnico
  • Queen's University of Belfast
  • University of Helsinki
  • VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd
  • University of Naples Federico II
  • Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia
  • IFP-CNR
  • Consorzio Rfx
  • Kurchatov Institute
  • Università di Napoli Parthenope
  • ENEA Centro Ricerche Frascati
  • Troitsk Insitute of Innovating and Thermonuclear Research (TRINITI)
  • Uppsala University
  • National Institute for Cryogenics and Isotopic Technology
  • Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik
  • Università degli Studi di Catania
  • Fusion for Energy
  • National Institute for Fusion Science
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  • Aalto University
  • ENAC-IIC-GEL
  • University of Latvia (LU)
  • Imperial College London
  • Laboratorio Nacional de Fusión
  • University of Oxford
  • EUROfusion Programme Management Unit
  • Institute of Meteorology and Climate Research
  • University of York
  • Maritime University of Szczecin
  • Institute for Nuclear Physics
  • Institute of Plasma Physics AS CR
  • Università di Trento
  • Wigner Research Centre for Physics
  • Comenius University
  • Lviv Polytechnic National University
  • University of Milano-Bicocca
  • National Institute for Optoelectronics
  • Fourth State Research
  • The University of Texas at Austin
  • Nuclear Research Centre
  • National Centre for Nuclear Research
  • Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory
  • Aix-Marseille Université
  • Universitá di Cagliari
  • University of Warwick
  • Soltan Institute for Nuclear Studies
  • FOM Institute DIFFER 'Dutch Institute for Fundamental Energy Research'
  • Plasma and Radiation Physics (INFLPR)
  • Ghent University
  • Department of Biochemistry and Molecular and Structural Biology
  • Nancy Université
  • Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences
  • Center for Energy Research
  • Koninklijke Militaire School - Ecole Royale Militaire
  • Horia Hulubei National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering
  • Chalmers University of Technology
  • European Commission
  • Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
  • University of Campania L. Vanvitelli
  • Warsaw University of Technology
  • Università degli Studi della Basilicata
  • Earth Sciences
  • Aix Marseille Université
  • University of Seville
  • Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Fisicas
  • IUSTI
  • University of Rome “Tor Vergata”
  • Ioffe Institute
  • General Atomics
  • University of Innsbruck
  • University of Toyama
  • University of Strathclyde
  • National Technical University of Athens
  • Tuscia University
  • Technical University of Denmark
  • Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology
  • Seoul National University
  • University College Cork
  • Vienna University of Technology
  • Opole University
  • Daegu University
  • National Fusion Research Institute
  • Dublin City University
  • PELIN LLC
  • Arizona State University
  • Complutense University
  • University of Basel
  • Universidad Carlos III de Madrid
  • Consorzio CREATE
  • NCSR Demokritos
  • Purdue University
  • Fluid and Plasma Dynamics
  • University of California
  • University of São Paulo
  • Lithuanian Energy Institute
  • HRS Fusion
  • Politecnico di Torino
  • Università di Cassino
  • Medical School of UESTC
  • Fukui University of Technology
  • Hokkaido University
  • Japan Atomic Energy Agency
  • Keio University
  • Kyoto Institute of Technology
  • Kyoto University
  • Kyushu University
  • Nagoya University
  • National Institute of Technology, Gifu College
  • Osaka University
  • Shizuoka University
  • University of Tokyo
  • Tohoku University
  • Tokyo Institute of Technology
  • Tottori University
  • University of Tsukuba
  • Fusion for Energy
  • Univ. Joseph Fourier-Grenoble 1
  • Institut Pierre Simon Laplace, CNRS and CEA
  • ENEA-CREATE
  • Dutch Institute for Fundamental Energy Research

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The stability with respect to a peelingballooning mode (PBM) was investigated numerically with extended MHD simulation codes in JET, JT-60U and future JT-60SA plasmas. The MINERVA-DI code was used to analyze the linear stability, including the effects of rotation and ion diamagnetic drift (w∗i), in JET-ILW and JT-60SA plasmas, and the JOREK code was used to simulate nonlinear dynamics with rotation, viscosity and resistivity in JT-60U plasmas. It was validated quantitatively that the ELM trigger condition in JET-ILW plasmas can be reasonably explained by taking into account both the rotation and w∗i effects in the numerical analysis. When deuterium poloidal rotation is evaluated based on neoclassical theory, an increase in the effective charge of plasma destabilizes the PBM because of an acceleration of rotation and a decrease in w∗i. The difference in the amount of ELM energy loss in JT-60U plasmas rotating in opposite directions was reproduced qualitatively with JOREK. By comparing the ELM affected areas with linear eigenfunctions, it was confirmed that the difference in the linear stability property, due not to the rotation direction but to the plasma density profile, is thought to be responsible for changing the ELM energy loss just after the ELM crash. A predictive study to determine the pedestal profiles in JT-60SA was performed by updating the EPED1 model to include the rotation and w∗i effects in the PBM stability analysis. It was shown that the plasma rotation predicted with the neoclassical toroidal viscosity degrades the pedestal performance by about 10% by destabilizing the PBM, but the pressure pedestal height will be high enough to achieve the target parameters required for the ITER-like shape inductive scenario in JT-60SA.

Original languageEnglish
Article number014032
JournalPlasma Physics and Controlled Fusion
Volume60
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2018
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • ELM
  • H-mode
  • extended MHD model
  • rotation
  • tokamaks

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Analysis of ELM stability with extended MHD models in JET, JT-60U and future JT-60SA tokamak plasmas'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this