Arguing to Learn

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

This chapter reviews collaborative argumentation, where a community of learners works together to advance the collective state of knowledge through debate, engagement, and dialogue. Engagement in collaborative argumentation can help students learn to think critically and independently about important issues and contested values. Students must externalize their ideas and metacognitively reflect on their developing understandings. This chapter summarizes the history of argumentation theory; how arguing can contribute to learning through making knowledge explicit, conceptual change, collaboration, and reasoning skills; how argumentation skill develops in childhood; and how argumentation varies in different cultural and social contexts. The chapter concludes by describing a variety of tools that scaffold effective argumentation, including through computer-mediated communication forums and argumentation maps.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages428-447
Number of pages20
ISBN (Electronic)9781108888295
ISBN (Print)9781108840989
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2022

Keywords

  • argumentation
  • articulation
  • collaboration
  • community of learners
  • engagement
  • externalization
  • scaffolding
  • scientific practices

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Arguing to Learn'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this