Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Assessing bias corrections of oceanic surface conditions for atmospheric models

  • Julien Beaumet
  • , Gerhard Krinner
  • , Michel Déqué
  • , Rein Haarsma
  • , Laurent Li
  • LTHE (UMR 5564 CNRS/IRD/Université de Grenoble)
  • Université Paul Sabatier
  • Royal Netherlands Meteorological I.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Future sea surface temperature and sea-ice concentration from coupled ocean-atmosphere general circulation models such as those from the CMIP5 experiment are often used as boundary forcings for the downscaling of future climate experiments. Yet, these models show some considerable biases when compared to the observations over present climate. In this paper, existing methods such as an absolute anomaly method and a quantile-quantile method for sea surface temperature (SST) as well as a look-up table and a relative anomaly method for sea-ice concentration (SIC) are presented. For SIC, we also propose a new analogue method. Each method is objectively evaluated with a perfect model test using CMIP5 model experiments and some real-case applications using observations. We find that with respect to other previously existing methods, the analogue method is a substantial improvement for the bias correction of future SIC. Consistency between the constructed SST and SIC fields is an important constraint to consider, as is consistency between the prescribed sea-ice concentration and thickness; we show that the latter can be ensured by using a simple parameterisation of sea-ice thickness as a function of instantaneous and annual minimum SIC.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)321-342
Number of pages22
JournalGeoscientific Model Development
Volume12
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 21 Jan 2019

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 13 - Climate Action
    SDG 13 Climate Action

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Assessing bias corrections of oceanic surface conditions for atmospheric models'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this