“Bad” Oil, “Worse” Oil, and Carbon Misallocation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Not all barrels of oil are created equal: their extraction varies in both private cost and carbon intensity. Leveraging a comprehensive micro-dataset on world oil fields, alongside detailed estimates of carbon intensities and private extraction costs, this study quantifies the additional emissions and costs from having extracted the “wrong” deposits. We do so by comparing historical deposit-level supplies to counterfactuals that factor in pollution costs, while keeping annual global consumption unchanged. Between 1992 and 2018, carbon misallocation amounted to at least 11.00 gigatons of CO2-equivalent (GtCO2eq), incurring an environmental cost evaluated at $2.2 trillion (US$ 2018). This translates into a significant supply-side ecological debt for major producers of high-carbon oil. Looking forward, we estimate the gains from making deposit-level extraction socially optimal at about 9.30 GtCO2eq, valued at $1.9 trillion, along a future aggregate demand pathway coherent with the objective of net-zero emissions in 2050, and document unequal reserve stranding across oil nations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)404-437
Number of pages34
JournalReview of Economic Studies
Volume93
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2026
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 13 - Climate Action
    SDG 13 Climate Action

Keywords

  • Carbon mitigation
  • Climate change
  • Misallocation
  • Oil
  • Stranded assets

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '“Bad” Oil, “Worse” Oil, and Carbon Misallocation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this