TY - JOUR
T1 - BAYESIAN CALIBRATION WITH ADAPTIVE MODEL DISCREPANCY
AU - Leoni, Nicolas
AU - Maître, Olivier Le
AU - Rodio, Maria Giovanna
AU - Congedo, Pietro Marco
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 by Begell House, Inc.
PY - 2024/1/1
Y1 - 2024/1/1
N2 - We investigate a computer model calibration technique inspired by the well-known Bayesian framework of Kennedy and O’Hagan (KOH). We tackle the full Bayesian formulation where model parameter and model discrepancy hyperparameters are estimated jointly and reduce the problem dimensionality by introducing a functional relationship that we call the full maximum a posteriori (FMP) method. This method also eliminates the need for a true value of model parameters that caused identifiability issues in the KOH formulation. When the joint posterior is approximated as a mixture of Gaussians, the FMP calibration is proven to avoid some pitfalls of the KOH calibration, namely missing some probability regions and underestimating the posterior variance. We then illustrate two numerical examples where both model error and measurement uncertainty are estimated together. Using the solution to the full Bayesian problem as a reference, we show that the FMP results are accurate and robust, and avoid the need for high-dimensional Markov chains for sampling.
AB - We investigate a computer model calibration technique inspired by the well-known Bayesian framework of Kennedy and O’Hagan (KOH). We tackle the full Bayesian formulation where model parameter and model discrepancy hyperparameters are estimated jointly and reduce the problem dimensionality by introducing a functional relationship that we call the full maximum a posteriori (FMP) method. This method also eliminates the need for a true value of model parameters that caused identifiability issues in the KOH formulation. When the joint posterior is approximated as a mixture of Gaussians, the FMP calibration is proven to avoid some pitfalls of the KOH calibration, namely missing some probability regions and underestimating the posterior variance. We then illustrate two numerical examples where both model error and measurement uncertainty are estimated together. Using the solution to the full Bayesian problem as a reference, we show that the FMP results are accurate and robust, and avoid the need for high-dimensional Markov chains for sampling.
KW - Bayesian calibration
KW - identifiability
KW - model discrepancy
KW - model error
KW - uncertainty quantification
U2 - 10.1615/Int.J.UncertaintyQuantification.2023046331
DO - 10.1615/Int.J.UncertaintyQuantification.2023046331
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85175336906
SN - 2152-5080
VL - 14
SP - 19
EP - 41
JO - International Journal for Uncertainty Quantification
JF - International Journal for Uncertainty Quantification
IS - 1
ER -