TY - GEN
T1 - Benchmarking the (1,4)-CMA-ES with mirrored sampling and sequential selection on the noiseless BBOB-2010 testbed
AU - Auger, Anne
AU - Brockhoff, Dimo
AU - Hansen, Nikolaus
PY - 2010/8/30
Y1 - 2010/8/30
N2 - The well-known Covariance Matrix Adaptation Evolution Strategy (CMA-ES) is a robust stochastic search algorithm for optimizing functions defined on a continuous search space ℝD. Recently, mirrored samples and sequential selection have been introduced within CMA-ES to improve its local search performances. In this paper, we benchmark the (1,4m S)-CMA-ES which implements mirrored samples and sequential selection on the BBOB-2010 noiseless testbed. Independent restarts are conducted until a maximal number of 104D function evaluations is reached. The experiments show that 11 of the 24 functions are solved in 20D (and 13 in 5D respectively). Compared to the function-wise target-wise best algorithm of the BBOB-2009 benchmarking, on 25% of the functions the (1,4m s)-CMA-ES is at most by a factor of 3.1 (and 3.8) slower in dimension 20 (and 5) for targets associated to budgets larger than 10D. Moreover, the (1,4mS)-CMA-ES slightly outperforms the best algorithm on the rotated ellipsoid function in 20D and would be ranked two on the Gallagher function with 101 peaks in 10D and 20D - being 25 times faster than the BIPOP-CMA-ES and about 3 times faster than the (1+1)-CMA-ES on this function.
AB - The well-known Covariance Matrix Adaptation Evolution Strategy (CMA-ES) is a robust stochastic search algorithm for optimizing functions defined on a continuous search space ℝD. Recently, mirrored samples and sequential selection have been introduced within CMA-ES to improve its local search performances. In this paper, we benchmark the (1,4m S)-CMA-ES which implements mirrored samples and sequential selection on the BBOB-2010 noiseless testbed. Independent restarts are conducted until a maximal number of 104D function evaluations is reached. The experiments show that 11 of the 24 functions are solved in 20D (and 13 in 5D respectively). Compared to the function-wise target-wise best algorithm of the BBOB-2009 benchmarking, on 25% of the functions the (1,4m s)-CMA-ES is at most by a factor of 3.1 (and 3.8) slower in dimension 20 (and 5) for targets associated to budgets larger than 10D. Moreover, the (1,4mS)-CMA-ES slightly outperforms the best algorithm on the rotated ellipsoid function in 20D and would be ranked two on the Gallagher function with 101 peaks in 10D and 20D - being 25 times faster than the BIPOP-CMA-ES and about 3 times faster than the (1+1)-CMA-ES on this function.
KW - Benchmarking
KW - Black-box optimization
U2 - 10.1145/1830761.1830781
DO - 10.1145/1830761.1830781
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:77955929851
SN - 9781450300735
T3 - Proceedings of the 12th Annual Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, GECCO '10 - Companion Publication
SP - 1617
EP - 1623
BT - Proceedings of the 12th Annual Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, GECCO '10 - Companion Publication
T2 - 12th Annual Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, GECCO-2010
Y2 - 7 July 2010 through 11 July 2010
ER -