TY - GEN
T1 - Benchmarking the Borg MOEA on the Biobjective bbob-biobj Testbed
AU - Brockhoff, Dimo
AU - Capetillo, Pascal
AU - Hornewall, Jonathan
AU - Walker, Raphael
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Copyright is held by the owner/author(s). Publication rights licensed to ACM.
PY - 2023/7/15
Y1 - 2023/7/15
N2 - The Borg MOEA [8] is an optimization algorithm, designed to handle real-world problems of a multi objective and multimodal nature. In this report, we examine the effectiveness of Borg for solving optimization problems with only two objectives. To this end, we benchmark the performance of the algorithm on the bbob-biobj test suite via the COCO platform, comparing it to current state-of-the-art algorithms. The study uses standard values for all the parameters but one, as retrieved from http://borgmoea.org/. The only parameter that varies between different problem instances is the ϵ parameter, a crucial scale tuning parameter. To adapt this parameter, we devised and applied a heuristic. We find that the algorithm performs respectably, although it does not surpass the current state-of-the-art algorithms for any of the problem instances examined, and particularly loses performance on problems with a high-dimensional search space. Additionally, we observed that our heuristic for tuning the ϵ-parameter results in significant performance improvements compared to using a fixed value for ϵ.
AB - The Borg MOEA [8] is an optimization algorithm, designed to handle real-world problems of a multi objective and multimodal nature. In this report, we examine the effectiveness of Borg for solving optimization problems with only two objectives. To this end, we benchmark the performance of the algorithm on the bbob-biobj test suite via the COCO platform, comparing it to current state-of-the-art algorithms. The study uses standard values for all the parameters but one, as retrieved from http://borgmoea.org/. The only parameter that varies between different problem instances is the ϵ parameter, a crucial scale tuning parameter. To adapt this parameter, we devised and applied a heuristic. We find that the algorithm performs respectably, although it does not surpass the current state-of-the-art algorithms for any of the problem instances examined, and particularly loses performance on problems with a high-dimensional search space. Additionally, we observed that our heuristic for tuning the ϵ-parameter results in significant performance improvements compared to using a fixed value for ϵ.
KW - Benchmarking
KW - Bi-objective optimization
KW - Black-box optimization
KW - Multi-modal
KW - Multi-objective
U2 - 10.1145/3583133.3596386
DO - 10.1145/3583133.3596386
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85169055332
T3 - GECCO 2023 Companion - Proceedings of the 2023 Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference Companion
SP - 1587
EP - 1594
BT - GECCO 2023 Companion - Proceedings of the 2023 Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference Companion
PB - Association for Computing Machinery, Inc
T2 - 2023 Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference Companion, GECCO 2023 Companion
Y2 - 15 July 2023 through 19 July 2023
ER -