Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Bounding Global Aerosol Radiative Forcing of Climate Change

  • N. Bellouin
  • , J. Quaas
  • , E. Gryspeerdt
  • , S. Kinne
  • , P. Stier
  • , D. Watson-Parris
  • , O. Boucher
  • , K. S. Carslaw
  • , M. Christensen
  • , A. L. Daniau
  • , J. L. Dufresne
  • , G. Feingold
  • , S. Fiedler
  • , P. Forster
  • , A. Gettelman
  • , J. M. Haywood
  • , U. Lohmann
  • , F. Malavelle
  • , T. Mauritsen
  • , D. T. McCoy
  • G. Myhre, J. Mülmenstädt, D. Neubauer, A. Possner, M. Rugenstein, Y. Sato, M. Schulz, S. E. Schwartz, O. Sourdeval, T. Storelvmo, V. Toll, D. Winker, B. Stevens
  • University of Reading
  • University of Leipzig
  • Imperial College London
  • Max Planck Institute for Meteorology
  • University of Oxford
  • Sorbonne Université
  • University of Leeds
  • Univ. Bordeaux
  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
  • Germany; University of Cologne
  • National Center for Atmospheric Research
  • University of Exeter
  • Now at Met Office Hadley Centre
  • ETH Zurich
  • Stockholm University
  • Center for International Climate Research (CICERO)
  • Carnegie Institution of Washington
  • Goethe University Frankfurt am Main
  • Nagoya University
  • Hokkaido University
  • Norwegian Meteorological Institute
  • Brookhaven National Laboratory
  • Université de Lille
  • University of Oslo
  • University Tartu
  • NASA Langley Research Center

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Aerosols interact with radiation and clouds. Substantial progress made over the past 40 years in observing, understanding, and modeling these processes helped quantify the imbalance in the Earth's radiation budget caused by anthropogenic aerosols, called aerosol radiative forcing, but uncertainties remain large. This review provides a new range of aerosol radiative forcing over the industrial era based on multiple, traceable, and arguable lines of evidence, including modeling approaches, theoretical considerations, and observations. Improved understanding of aerosol absorption and the causes of trends in surface radiative fluxes constrain the forcing from aerosol-radiation interactions. A robust theoretical foundation and convincing evidence constrain the forcing caused by aerosol-driven increases in liquid cloud droplet number concentration. However, the influence of anthropogenic aerosols on cloud liquid water content and cloud fraction is less clear, and the influence on mixed-phase and ice clouds remains poorly constrained. Observed changes in surface temperature and radiative fluxes provide additional constraints. These multiple lines of evidence lead to a 68% confidence interval for the total aerosol effective radiative forcing of -1.6 to -0.6 W m−2, or -2.0 to -0.4 W m−2 with a 90% likelihood. Those intervals are of similar width to the last Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change assessment but shifted toward more negative values. The uncertainty will narrow in the future by continuing to critically combine multiple lines of evidence, especially those addressing industrial-era changes in aerosol sources and aerosol effects on liquid cloud amount and on ice clouds.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere2019RG000660
JournalReviews of Geophysics
Volume58
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2020

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 13 - Climate Action
    SDG 13 Climate Action

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Bounding Global Aerosol Radiative Forcing of Climate Change'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this