Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Bringing it all together: Science priorities for improved understanding of Earth system change and to support international climate policy

  • Colin G. Jones
  • , Fanny Adloff
  • , Ben B.B. Booth
  • , Peter M. Cox
  • , Veronika Eyring
  • , Pierre Friedlingstein
  • , Katja Frieler
  • , Helene T. Hewitt
  • , Hazel A. Jeffery
  • , Sylvie Joussaume
  • , Torben Koenigk
  • , Bryan N. Lawrence
  • , Eleanor O'Rourke
  • , Malcolm J. Roberts
  • , Benjamin M. Sanderson
  • , Roland Séférian
  • , Samuel Somot
  • , Pier Luigi Vidale
  • , Detlef Van Vuuren
  • , Mario Acosta
  • Mats Bentsen, Raffaele Bernardello, Richard Betts, Ed Blockley, Julien Boé, Tom Bracegirdle, Pascale Braconnot, Victor Brovkin, Carlo Buontempo, Francisco Doblas-Reyes, Markus Donat, Italo Epicoco, Pete Falloon, Sandro Fiore, Thomas Frölicher, Neven S. Fučkar, Matthew J. Gidden, Helge F. Goessling, Rune Grand Graversen, Silvio Gualdi, José M. Gutiérrez, Tatiana Ilyina, Daniela Jacob, Chris D. Jones, Martin Juckes, Elizabeth Kendon, Erik Kjellström, Reto Knutti, Jason Lowe, Matthew Mizielinski, Paola Nassisi, Michael Obersteiner, Pierre Regnier, Romain Roehrig, David Salas Y Mélia, Carl Friedrich Schleussner, Michael Schulz, Enrico Scoccimarro, Laurent Terray, Hannes Thiemann, Richard A. Wood, Shuting Yang, Sönke Zaehle
  • University of Leeds
  • Helmholtz-Zentrum Hereon GmbH
  • Now at Met Office Hadley Centre
  • University of Exeter
  • DLR
  • University of Bremen
  • Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK)
  • Université Versailles-Saint Quentin
  • Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute
  • Stockholm University
  • University of Reading
  • ECSAT
  • Center for International Climate Research (CICERO)
  • Université Paul Sabatier
  • PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency
  • Utrecht University
  • Earth Sciences
  • NORCE Norwegian Research Centre AS
  • Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research
  • Centre national de la recherche scientifique
  • British Antarctic Survey
  • Max Planck Institute for Meteorology
  • ECMWF
  • Pompeu Fabra University (UPF)
  • Euro Mediterranean Center on Climage Change
  • University of Salento
  • University of Bristol
  • Università di Trento
  • University of Bern
  • University of Oxford
  • International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA)
  • Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Sciences
  • University of Tromsø - The Arctic University of Norway
  • CSIC-Univ. Cantabria
  • Universität Hamburg
  • STFC UK-ATC
  • ETH Zurich
  • Université Libre de Bruxelles
  • Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
  • Norwegian Meteorological Institute
  • Now at Danish Meteorological Institute
  • Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

We review how the international modelling community, encompassing integrated assessment models, global and regional Earth system and climate models, and impact models, has worked together over the past few decades to advance understanding of Earth system change and its impacts on society and the environment and thereby support international climate policy. We go on to recommend a number of priority research areas for the coming decade, a timescale that encompasses a number of newly starting international modelling activities, as well as the IPCC Seventh Assessment Report (AR7) and the second UNFCCC Global Stocktake. Progress in these priority areas will significantly advance our understanding of Earth system change and its impacts, increasing the quality and utility of science support to climate policy. We emphasize the need for continued improvement in our understanding of, and ability to simulate, the coupled Earth system and the impacts of Earth system change. There is an urgent need to investigate plausible pathways and emission scenarios that realize the Paris climate targets - for example, pathways that overshoot 1.5 or 2 °C global warming, before returning to these levels at some later date. Earth system models need to be capable of thoroughly assessing such warming overshoots - in particular, the efficacy of mitigation measures, such as negative CO2 emissions, in reducing atmospheric CO2 and driving global cooling. An improved assessment of the long-term consequences of stabilizing climate at 1.5 or 2 °C above pre-industrial temperatures is also required. We recommend Earth system models run overshoot scenarios in CO2-emission mode to more fully represent coupled climate-carbon-cycle feedbacks and, wherever possible, interactively simulate other key Earth system phenomena at risk of rapid change during overshoot. Regional downscaling and impact models should use forcing data from these simulations, so impact and regional climate projections cover a more complete range of potential responses to a warming overshoot. An accurate simulation of the observed, historical record remains a fundamental requirement of models, as does accurate simulation of key metrics, such as the effective climate sensitivity and the transient climate response to cumulative carbon emissions. For adaptation, a key demand is improved guidance on potential changes in climate extremes and the modes of variability these extremes develop within. Such improvements will most likely be realized through a combination of increased model resolution, improvement of key model parameterizations, and enhanced representation of important Earth system processes, combined with targeted use of new artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) techniques. We propose a deeper collaboration across such efforts over the coming decade. With respect to sampling future uncertainty, increased collaboration between approaches that emphasize large model ensembles and those focussed on statistical emulation is required. We recommend an increased focus on high-impact-low-likelihood (HILL) outcomes - in particular, the risk and consequences of exceeding critical tipping points during a warming overshoot and the potential impacts arising from this. For a comprehensive assessment of the impacts of Earth system change, including impacts arising directly as a result of climate mitigation actions, it is important that spatially detailed, disaggregated information used to generate future scenarios in integrated assessment models be available for use in impact models. Conversely, there is a need to develop methods that enable potential societal responses to projected Earth system change to be incorporated into scenario development. The new models, simulations, data, and scientific advances proposed in this article will not be possible without long-term development and maintenance of a robust, globally connected infrastructure ecosystem. This system must be easily accessible and useable by modelling communities across the world, allowing the global research community to be fully engaged in developing and delivering new scientific knowledge to support international climate policy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1319-1351
Number of pages33
JournalEarth System Dynamics
Volume15
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 18 Oct 2024

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 13 - Climate Action
    SDG 13 Climate Action

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Bringing it all together: Science priorities for improved understanding of Earth system change and to support international climate policy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this