Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Can further mitigation of ammonia emissions reduce exceedances of particulate matter air quality standards?

  • Bertrand Bessagnet
  • , Maxime Beauchamp
  • , Cristina Guerreiro
  • , Frank de Leeuw
  • , Svetlana Tsyro
  • , Augustin Colette
  • , Frédérik Meleux
  • , Laurence Rouïl
  • , Paul Ruyssenaars
  • , Ferd Sauter
  • , Guus J.M. Velders
  • , Valentin L. Foltescu
  • , John van Aardenne
  • INERIS Institut National de l'Environnement Industriel et des Risques
  • Norwegian Institute for Air Research
  • National Institute for Public Health and the Environment
  • Norwegian Meteorological Institute
  • European Environment Agency, Denmark

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

62 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Several studies point out the importance of agricultural emissions to particulate matter (PM) concentrations, and particularly of NH3 emissions to PM2.5. Our study used three different chemical transport models (CHIMERE, EMEP and LOTOS-EUROS) to quantify the reductions of PM2.5 and PM10 concentrations due to reductions of NH3 emissions beyond the Gothenburg Protocol (GP), as well as due to the GP alone compared to 2009. Simulations of PM2.5 and PM10 concentrations using 2009 meteorology were undertaken for five emission scenarios: 2009 emissions (as the reference simulation), GP emissions in 2020, and further 10%, 20% and 30% NH3 emission reductions in EU27 beyond the GP. The modelling results for the scenarios with further 10%, 20% and 30% NH3 agriculture emission reductions in EU27 beyond the GP show that the reduction achieved in PM concentrations is not linear with the emission reductions. In fact, the results from the study show that the impact of ammonia emissions reduction is significantly more efficient when the emission reduction rises. Moreover, based on the evaluation on 2009, the modelling study shows that the expected impact of ammonia emissions on the formation of particulate ammonium was underestimated by all models. This would imply that the role of ammonia on PM concentration and exceedances of PM2.5 and PM10 limit values is likely to be even larger than quantified in this study. This study shows that the implementation of the emission reductions imposed by the revised GP for 2020 will not suffice to achieve compliance with PM limit values everywhere in Europe; hence further European and local measures may be considered. NH3 emissions from agriculture can be further reduced with the implementation of proven and feasible measures (substitution of fertilizers, improved storage of manure, way fertilizer injections, etc., . . .), in order to reduce PM concentrations and their impacts on human health across Europe.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)149-163
Number of pages15
JournalEnvironmental Science and Policy
Volume44
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2014
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 2 - Zero Hunger
    SDG 2 Zero Hunger
  2. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Agriculture
  • Ammonia
  • Chemistry transport model
  • Emission scenarios
  • Gothenburg Protocol

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Can further mitigation of ammonia emissions reduce exceedances of particulate matter air quality standards?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this