Carbon leakage and capacity-based allocations: Is the EU right?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Competitiveness and carbon leakage are major concerns for the design of CO2 emissions permits markets. In the absence of a global carbon tax and of border carbon adjustments, output-based allocation is a third-best solution and is actually implemented (Australia, California, New Zealand). The EU has followed a different route; free allowances are allocated to existing or new capacities in proportion to a benchmark, independent of actual production. This paper compares these two schemes in a formal setting and shows that the optimal one is in fact a combination of both schemes, or output-based allocation alone if uncertainty is limited. A key assumption of our analysis is that the short-term import pressure depends both on the existing capacities and the level of demand, which is typical in capital intensive and internationally traded sectors. A calibration of the model is used to discuss the EU scheme for the cement sector in the third phase of the EU-ETS (2013-2020). This allows for a quantification of various policies in terms of welfare, investment, production, company profits, public revenues and leakage.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)262-279
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Environmental Economics and Management
Volume68
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sept 2014
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 13 - Climate Action
    SDG 13 Climate Action

Keywords

  • Cap and trade
  • Carbon leakage
  • Climate policy
  • Competitiveness
  • Output-based allocation
  • Subsidization of capacity

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Carbon leakage and capacity-based allocations: Is the EU right?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this