Abstract
Competitiveness and carbon leakage are major concerns for the design of CO2 emissions permits markets. In the absence of a global carbon tax and of border carbon adjustments, output-based allocation is a third-best solution and is actually implemented (Australia, California, New Zealand). The EU has followed a different route; free allowances are allocated to existing or new capacities in proportion to a benchmark, independent of actual production. This paper compares these two schemes in a formal setting and shows that the optimal one is in fact a combination of both schemes, or output-based allocation alone if uncertainty is limited. A key assumption of our analysis is that the short-term import pressure depends both on the existing capacities and the level of demand, which is typical in capital intensive and internationally traded sectors. A calibration of the model is used to discuss the EU scheme for the cement sector in the third phase of the EU-ETS (2013-2020). This allows for a quantification of various policies in terms of welfare, investment, production, company profits, public revenues and leakage.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 262-279 |
| Number of pages | 18 |
| Journal | Journal of Environmental Economics and Management |
| Volume | 68 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Sept 2014 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 13 Climate Action
Keywords
- Cap and trade
- Carbon leakage
- Climate policy
- Competitiveness
- Output-based allocation
- Subsidization of capacity
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Carbon leakage and capacity-based allocations: Is the EU right?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver