Changing our view on design evaluation meetings methodology: A study of software technical review meetings

Patrick D'Astous, Françoise Détienne, Willemien Visser, Pierre N. Robillard

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

By contrast to design meetings, design evaluation meetings (DEMs) have generally been considered as situations in which, according to DEM methodologies, design activities are quite marginal. In a study of DEMs in software development, i.e. in technical review meetings following a particular review methodology, we showed: (i) the occurrence of design activities as part of an argumentation process; (ii) the relative importance of cognitive synchronisation as a prerequisite for evaluation; (iii) the important role played in evaluation by argumentation that makes explicit the underlying design rationale (DR). On the basis of our results, we discuss the potential for using DR methodologies in this kind of meetings.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)625-655
Number of pages31
JournalDesign Studies
Volume25
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2004
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Collaborative design
  • Design activity
  • Design methodology
  • Teamwork

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Changing our view on design evaluation meetings methodology: A study of software technical review meetings'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this