Classical and quantum strong energy inequalities and the Hawking singularity theorem

P. J. Brown, C. J. Fewster, E. A. Kontou

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperpeer-review

Abstract

Hawking's singularity theorem concerns matter obeying the strong energy condition (SEC), which means that all observers experience a non-negative effective energy density (EED). The SEC ensures the timelike convergence property. However, for both classical and quantum fields, violations of the SEC can be observed even in the simplest of cases, like the Klein-Gordon field. Therefore there is a need to develop theorems with weaker restrictions, namely energy conditions averaged over an entire geodesic and weighted lo- cal averages of energy densities such as quantum energy inequalities (QEIs). We present lower bounds of the EED for both classical and quantum scalar fields allowing nonzero mass and nonminimal coupling to the scalar curvature. In the quantum case these bounds take the form of a set of state-dependent QEIs valid for the class of Hadamard states. We also discuss how these lower bounds are applied to prove Hawking-type singularity theorems asserting that, along with sufficient initial contraction, the spacetime is future timelike geodesically incomplete.

Original languageEnglish
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2022
Externally publishedYes
Event15th Marcel Grossmann Meeting on Recent Developments in Theoretical and Experimental General Relativity, Astrophysics, and Relativistic Field Theories, MG 2018 - Rome, Italy
Duration: 1 Jul 20187 Jul 2018

Conference

Conference15th Marcel Grossmann Meeting on Recent Developments in Theoretical and Experimental General Relativity, Astrophysics, and Relativistic Field Theories, MG 2018
Country/TerritoryItaly
CityRome
Period1/07/187/07/18

Keywords

  • Energy conditions
  • Gravity
  • Quantum fields
  • Quantum inequalities
  • Singularities

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Classical and quantum strong energy inequalities and the Hawking singularity theorem'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this