Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Clustering validity assessment: Finding the optimal partitioning of a data set

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

Abstract

Clustering is a mostly unsupervised procedure and the majority of the clustering algorithms depend on certain assumptions in order to define the subgroups present in a data set. As a consequence, in most applications the resulting clustering scheme requires some sort of evaluation as regards its validity. In this paper we present a clustering validity procedure, which evaluates the results of clustering algorithms on data sets. We define a validity index, S-Dbw, based on well-defined clustering criteria enabling the selection of the optimal input parameters' values for a clustering algorithm that result in the best partitioning of a data set. We evaluate the reliability of our index both theoretically and experimentally, considering three representative clustering algorithms ran on synthetic and real data sets. Also, we carried out an evaluation study to compare S-Dbw performance with other known validity indices. Our approach performed favorably in all cases, even in those that other indices failed to indicate the correct partitions in a data set.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings - 2001 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, ICDM'01
Pages187-194
Number of pages8
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2001
Externally publishedYes
Event1st IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, ICDM'01 - San Jose, CA, United States
Duration: 29 Nov 20012 Dec 2001

Publication series

NameProceedings - IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, ICDM
ISSN (Print)1550-4786

Conference

Conference1st IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, ICDM'01
Country/TerritoryUnited States
CitySan Jose, CA
Period29/11/012/12/01

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Clustering validity assessment: Finding the optimal partitioning of a data set'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this