Comparative study of patterned TiO2 and Al2O3 layers as passivated back-contact for ultra-thin Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells

F. Mollica, J. Goffard, M. Jubault, F. Donsanti, S. Collin, A. Cattoni, L. Lombez, N. Naghavi

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

Abstract

In this work, a low cost passivated back-contact for ultra-thin Cu(In,Ga)Se2-based (CIGS) solar cells to improve the carrier collection is developed. The current loss due to rear-interface recombination was first estimated with an accurate opto-electrical model. We compared the use of a sol-gel TiO2 and an ALD-Al2O3 layer for the back-contact passivation. 400-420 nm CIGS cells were fabricated on the oxide/Mo substrate with point-contacts patterned by nanoimprint lithography. The use of a patterned-Mo/Al2O3 back-contact leads to an increase of the cell performance compared to the standard Mo back-contact. The passivation effect is discussed and is characterized by photoluminescence.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication2017 IEEE 44th Photovoltaic Specialist Conference, PVSC 2017
PublisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
Pages1594-1597
Number of pages4
ISBN (Electronic)9781509056057
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2017
Event44th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialist Conference, PVSC 2017 - Washington, United States
Duration: 25 Jun 201730 Jun 2017

Publication series

Name2017 IEEE 44th Photovoltaic Specialist Conference, PVSC 2017

Conference

Conference44th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialist Conference, PVSC 2017
Country/TerritoryUnited States
CityWashington
Period25/06/1730/06/17

Keywords

  • Back-contact recombination
  • Charge carrier collection
  • Cu(In
  • Ga)Se
  • Nanoimprint
  • Passivation layer
  • Photoluminescence
  • Solar cells

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparative study of patterned TiO2 and Al2O3 layers as passivated back-contact for ultra-thin Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this