Abstract
In this work, a low cost passivated back-contact for ultra-thin Cu(In,Ga)Se2-based (CIGS) solar cells to improve the carrier collection is developed. The current loss due to rear-interface recombination was first estimated with an accurate opto-electrical model. We compared the use of a sol-gel TiO2 and an ALD-Al2O3 layer for the back-contact passivation. 400-420 nm CIGS cells were fabricated on the oxide/Mo substrate with point-contacts patterned by nanoimprint lithography. The use of a patterned-Mo/Al2O3 back-contact leads to an increase of the cell performance compared to the standard Mo back-contact. The passivation effect is discussed and is characterized by photoluminescence.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | 2017 IEEE 44th Photovoltaic Specialist Conference, PVSC 2017 |
| Publisher | Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. |
| Pages | 1594-1597 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9781509056057 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jan 2017 |
| Event | 44th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialist Conference, PVSC 2017 - Washington, United States Duration: 25 Jun 2017 → 30 Jun 2017 |
Publication series
| Name | 2017 IEEE 44th Photovoltaic Specialist Conference, PVSC 2017 |
|---|
Conference
| Conference | 44th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialist Conference, PVSC 2017 |
|---|---|
| Country/Territory | United States |
| City | Washington |
| Period | 25/06/17 → 30/06/17 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy
Keywords
- Back-contact recombination
- Charge carrier collection
- Cu(In
- Ga)Se
- Nanoimprint
- Passivation layer
- Photoluminescence
- Solar cells
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Comparative study of patterned TiO2 and Al2O3 layers as passivated back-contact for ultra-thin Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver