Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Comparison of MADM decision algorithms for interface selection in heterogeneous wireless networks

  • Department of Computer Science and Networking
  • Telecom Paris

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution › peer-review

50 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Current mobile terminals are often equipped with several network interfaces, which may be of different access technologies, both wireless and cellular. It is possible to select dynamically the best interface according to different attributes such as the interface characteristics, user preferences and/or application preferences,...MADM is an algorithmic approach suitable to realize a dynamic interface selection with multiple alternatives (interfaces) and attributes (interface characteristics, user preferences...). In this paper, we compare the performance of three MADM algorithms e.g. SAW, WP, and TOPSIS. The simulation results show that each algorithm has its own limitations. TOPSIS suffered from "ranking abnormality" problem, SAW and WP provide less accuracy in identifying the alternative ranks compared to TOPSIS.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationSoftCom 2008
Subtitle of host publication16th International Conference on Software, Telecommuncations and Computer Networks
Pages119-124
Number of pages6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 22 Dec 2008
EventSoftCom 2008: 16th International Conference on Software, Telecommuncations and Computer Networks - Split-Dubrovnik, Croatia
Duration: 25 Sept 2008 → 27 Sept 2008

Publication series

NameSoftCom 2008: 16th International Conference on Software, Telecommuncations and Computer Networks

Conference

ConferenceSoftCom 2008: 16th International Conference on Software, Telecommuncations and Computer Networks
Country/TerritoryCroatia
CitySplit-Dubrovnik
Period25/09/08 → 27/09/08

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of MADM decision algorithms for interface selection in heterogeneous wireless networks'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this