Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Comparison of photoluminescence and capacitance spectroscopies as efficient tools for interface characterisation of heterojunction solar cells

  • R. Chouffot
  • , S. Ibrahim
  • , R. Brüggemann
  • , A. S. Gudovskikh
  • , J. P. Kleider
  • , M. Scherff
  • , W. R. Fahrner
  • , P. Roca i. Cabarrocas
  • , D. Eon
  • , P. J. Ribeyron
  • Université Paris-Sud 11
  • Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg
  • Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry
  • Praktische Informatik IV Fernuniversität Hagen
  • Institut polytechnique de Paris
  • Univ. Joseph Fourier-Grenoble 1

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The correlation between diffusion capacitance and photoluminescence as a method of interface-defect density characterisation in amorphous silicon/crystalline silicon heterojunction solar cells is explored by numerical modelling and experimentally. At open circuit, the influence of the defect density at the front amorphous silicon/crystalline silicon interface and the surface recombination velocity of the minority carriers in the bulk depend on the doping level of the crystalline silicon and the critical contribution of the majority carriers. Experimental illustration is given for five series of solar cells with different doping levels, interface properties and back contacts. We observe agreement between simulation and experimental results and a correlation between the two methods of measurement of interface defects.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2416-2420
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Non-Crystalline Solids
Volume354
Issue number19-25
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2008

Keywords

  • Defects
  • Heterojunctions
  • Modeling and simulation
  • Optical spectroscopy
  • Photovoltaics
  • Silicon
  • Solar cells

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of photoluminescence and capacitance spectroscopies as efficient tools for interface characterisation of heterojunction solar cells'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this