Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Compensatory water effects link yearly global land CO 2 sink changes to temperature

  • Martin Jung
  • , Markus Reichstein
  • , Christopher R. Schwalm
  • , Chris Huntingford
  • , Stephen Sitch
  • , Anders Ahlström
  • , Almut Arneth
  • , Gustau Camps-Valls
  • , Philippe Ciais
  • , Pierre Friedlingstein
  • , Fabian Gans
  • , Kazuhito Ichii
  • , Atul K. Jain
  • , Etsushi Kato
  • , Dario Papale
  • , Ben Poulter
  • , Botond Raduly
  • , Christian Rödenbeck
  • , Gianluca Tramontana
  • , Nicolas Viovy
  • Ying Ping Wang, Ulrich Weber, Sönke Zaehle, Ning Zeng
  • Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry
  • Friedrich-Schiller University
  • Woods Hole Research Center
  • Centre for Ecology and Hydrology
  • University of Exeter
  • Stanford University
  • Lund University
  • Institute of Meteorology and Climate Research
  • University of Valencia
  • Université Versailles-Saint Quentin
  • JAMSTEC
  • National Institute for Environmental Studies of Japan
  • University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
  • Institute of Applied Energy (IAE)
  • Tuscia University
  • NASA Goddard Space Flight Center
  • Sapientia Hungarian University of Transylvania
  • Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization
  • Institute of Atmospheric Physics Chinese Academy of Sciences
  • University of Maryland

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Large interannual variations in the measured growth rate of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO 2) originate primarily from fluctuations in carbon uptake by land ecosystems. It remains uncertain, however, to what extent temperature and water availability control the carbon balance of land ecosystems across spatial and temporal scales. Here we use empirical models based on eddy covariance data and process-based models to investigate the effect of changes in temperature and water availability on gross primary productivity (GPP), terrestrial ecosystem respiration (TER) and net ecosystem exchange (NEE) at local and global scales. We find that water availability is the dominant driver of the local interannual variability in GPP and TER. To a lesser extent this is true also for NEE at the local scale, but when integrated globally, temporal NEE variability is mostly driven by temperature fluctuations. We suggest that this apparent paradox can be explained by two compensatory water effects. Temporal water-driven GPP and TER variations compensate locally, dampening water-driven NEE variability. Spatial water availability anomalies also compensate, leaving a dominant temperature signal in the year-to-year fluctuations of the land carbon sink. These findings help to reconcile seemingly contradictory reports regarding the importance of temperature and water in controlling the interannual variability of the terrestrial carbon balance. Our study indicates that spatial climate covariation drives the global carbon cycle response.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)516-520
Number of pages5
JournalNature
Volume541
Issue number7638
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 26 Jan 2017
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 13 - Climate Action
    SDG 13 Climate Action
  2. SDG 15 - Life on Land
    SDG 15 Life on Land

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Compensatory water effects link yearly global land CO 2 sink changes to temperature'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this