TY - GEN
T1 - Competitive Online Scheduling Algorithms with Applications in Deadline-Constrained EV Charging
AU - Alinia, Bahram
AU - Talebi, Mohammad Sadegh
AU - Hajiesmaili, Mohammad H.
AU - Yekkehkhany, Ali
AU - Crespi, Noel
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 IEEE.
PY - 2019/1/22
Y1 - 2019/1/22
N2 - This paper studies the classical problem of online scheduling of deadline-sensitive jobs with partial values and investigates its extension to Electric Vehicle (EV) charging scheduling by taking into account the processing rate limit of jobs and charging station capacity constraint. The problem lies in the category of time-coupled online scheduling problems without availability of future information. This paper proposes two online algorithms, both of which are shown to be (2-\frac{1}{U})-competitive, where U is the maximum scarcity level, a parameter that indicates demand-to-supply ratio. The first proposed algorithm is deterministic, whereas the second is randomized and enjoys a lower computational complexity. When U grows large, the performance of both algorithms approaches that of the state-of-the-art for the case where there is processing rate limits on the jobs. Nonetheless in realistic cases, where U is typically small, the proposed algorithms enjoy a much lower competitive ratio. To carry out the competitive analysis of our algorithms, we present a proof technique, which is novel to the best of our knowledge. This technique could also be used to simplify the competitive analysis of some existing algorithms, and thus could be of independent interest.
AB - This paper studies the classical problem of online scheduling of deadline-sensitive jobs with partial values and investigates its extension to Electric Vehicle (EV) charging scheduling by taking into account the processing rate limit of jobs and charging station capacity constraint. The problem lies in the category of time-coupled online scheduling problems without availability of future information. This paper proposes two online algorithms, both of which are shown to be (2-\frac{1}{U})-competitive, where U is the maximum scarcity level, a parameter that indicates demand-to-supply ratio. The first proposed algorithm is deterministic, whereas the second is randomized and enjoys a lower computational complexity. When U grows large, the performance of both algorithms approaches that of the state-of-the-art for the case where there is processing rate limits on the jobs. Nonetheless in realistic cases, where U is typically small, the proposed algorithms enjoy a much lower competitive ratio. To carry out the competitive analysis of our algorithms, we present a proof technique, which is novel to the best of our knowledge. This technique could also be used to simplify the competitive analysis of some existing algorithms, and thus could be of independent interest.
U2 - 10.1109/IWQoS.2018.8624184
DO - 10.1109/IWQoS.2018.8624184
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85062619764
T3 - 2018 IEEE/ACM 26th International Symposium on Quality of Service, IWQoS 2018
BT - 2018 IEEE/ACM 26th International Symposium on Quality of Service, IWQoS 2018
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 26th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Quality of Service, IWQoS 2018
Y2 - 4 June 2018 through 6 June 2018
ER -