Conflicts and incentives in wireless cooperative relaying: A distributed market pricing framework

Lin Chen, Lavy Libman, Jean Leneutre

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Extensive research in recent years has shown the benefits of cooperative relaying in wireless networks, where nodes overhear and cooperatively forward packets transmitted between their neighbors. Most existing studies focus on physical-layer optimization of the effective channel capacity for a given transmitter-receiver link; however, the interaction among simultaneous flows between different endpoint pairs, and the conflicts arising from their competition for a shared pool of relay nodes, are not yet well understood. In this paper, we study a distributed pricing framework, where sources pay relay nodes to forward their packets, and the payment is shared equally whenever a packet is successfully relayed by several nodes at once. We formulate this scenario as a Stackelberg (leader-follower) game, in which sources set the payment rates they offer, and relay nodes respond by choosing the flows to cooperate with. We provide a systematic analysis of the fundamental structural properties of this generic model. We show that multiple follower equilibria exist in general due to the nonconcave nature of their game, yet only one equilibrium possesses certain continuity properties that further lead to a unique system equilibrium among the leaders. We further demonstrate that the resulting equilibria are reasonably efficient in several typical scenarios.

Original languageEnglish
Article number5557859
Pages (from-to)758-772
Number of pages15
JournalIEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems
Volume22
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 14 Feb 2011
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Cooperative communication
  • Stackelberg game
  • pricing
  • relay selection

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Conflicts and incentives in wireless cooperative relaying: A distributed market pricing framework'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this