Abstract
In the original article, there was a wording error on the way that the reduction percentages of air pollutant concentrations were expressed. It is not a reduction percentage but a percentage of increase that would have been observed in the absence of lockdown. A correction has been made to Discussion, “Summary of Findings,” first paragraph: We replaced the following sentences: “The mean reduction in PM10 concentrations was 8.3%, with values ranging from−1.8 to 39.8% depending on the municipality. For NO2 concentrations, the mean reduction was 29.0%, with values ranging from 3.5 to 187.8% depending on the municipality.” by: “The daily mean difference between the estimated PM10 level during lockdown and its reference (modeled concentrations without lockdown) was −8.3 μg.m−3. This difference was −2.1 μg.m−3 for NO2.”.In the original article, there was a mistake in Table 2 as published. The four columns entitled “Reduction percentage” were not defined. The corrected Table 2 appears below. The authors apologize for these errors and state that this doesnot change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 940436 |
| Journal | Frontiers in Sustainable Cities |
| Volume | 4 |
| DOIs |
|
| Publication status | Published - 13 Jun 2022 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy
-
SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities
Keywords
- COVID-19
- France
- air pollution
- health impact assessment
- lockdown
- mortality
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Corrigendum: Covid-19 Lockdown in Spring 2020 in France Provided Unexpected Opportunity to Assess Health Impacts of Falls in Air Pollution(Front. Sustain. Cities, (2022), 3, (643821), 10.3389/frsc.2021.643821)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver