Abstract
In this article we compare the performances of a logistic regression and a feed forward neural network for credit scoring purposes. Our results show that the logistic regression gives quite good results on the dataset and the neural network can improve the performance a little. We also consider different sets of features in order to assess their importance in terms of prediction accuracy. We found that temporal features can be an important source of information resulting in an increase in the overall model accuracy. Finally, we introduce a new technique for the calibration of predicted probabilities based on Stein’s unbiased risk estimate (SURE). This calibration technique can be applied to very general calibration functions such as the sigmoid function and the Kumaraswamy function, which includes the identity as a particular case. We show that stacking the SURE calibration technique with the classical Platt method can improve the calibration results.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 155-179 |
| Number of pages | 25 |
| Journal | International Journal of Applied Decision Sciences |
| Volume | 19 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jan 2026 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- SURE
- Stein’s unbiased risk estimate
- calibration
- credit scoring
- deep learning
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Credit scoring using neural networks and SURE posterior probability calibration'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver