TY - JOUR
T1 - Cross-sectional survey
T2 - Risk-averse French general practitioners are more favorable toward influenza vaccination
AU - Massin, Sophie
AU - Ventelou, Bruno
AU - Nebout, Antoine
AU - Verger, Pierre
AU - Pulcini, Céline
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 Elsevier Ltd.
PY - 2015/1/29
Y1 - 2015/1/29
N2 - ObjectivesWe tested the following hypotheses: (i) risk-averse general practitioners (GPs) are more likely to be vaccinated against influenza; (ii) and risk-averse GPs recommend influenza vaccination more often to their patients. In risk-averse GPs, the perceived benefits of the vaccine and/or the perceived risks of the infectious disease might indeed outweigh the perceived risks of the vaccine. Patients/MethodsIn 2010-2012, we conducted a cross-sectional survey of a nationwide French representative sample of 1136 GPs. Multivariate analyses adjusted for four stratification variables (age, gender, urban/suburban/rural practice location and annual patient consultations) and for GPs' characteristics (group/solo practice, and occasional practice of alternative medicine, e.g., homeopathy) looked for associations between their risk attitudes and self-reported vaccination behavior. Individual risk attitudes were expressed as a continuous variable, from 0 (risk-tolerant) to 10 (risk-averse). ResultsOverall, 69% of GPs reported that they were very favorable toward vaccination in general. Self-reported vaccination coverage was 78% for 2009/2010 seasonal influenza and 62% for A/H1N1 pandemic influenza. Most GPs (72%) reported recommending the pandemic influenza vaccination to at-risk young adults in 2009, but few than half (42%) to young adults not at risk. In multivariate analyses, risk-averse GPs were more often vaccinated against seasonal (marginal effect. = 1.3%, P= 0.02) and pandemic influenza (marginal effect. = 1.5%, P= 0.02). Risk-averse GPs recommended the pandemic influenza vaccination more often than their more risk-tolerant colleagues to patients without risk factors (marginal effect. = 1.7%, P= 0.01), but not to their at-risk patients and were more favorable toward vaccination in general (marginal effect. = 1.5%, P= 0.04). ConclusionIndividual risk attitudes may influence GPs' practices regarding influenza vaccination, both for themselves and their patients. Our results suggest that risk-averse GPs may perceive the risks of influenza to outweigh the potential risks related to the vaccine.
AB - ObjectivesWe tested the following hypotheses: (i) risk-averse general practitioners (GPs) are more likely to be vaccinated against influenza; (ii) and risk-averse GPs recommend influenza vaccination more often to their patients. In risk-averse GPs, the perceived benefits of the vaccine and/or the perceived risks of the infectious disease might indeed outweigh the perceived risks of the vaccine. Patients/MethodsIn 2010-2012, we conducted a cross-sectional survey of a nationwide French representative sample of 1136 GPs. Multivariate analyses adjusted for four stratification variables (age, gender, urban/suburban/rural practice location and annual patient consultations) and for GPs' characteristics (group/solo practice, and occasional practice of alternative medicine, e.g., homeopathy) looked for associations between their risk attitudes and self-reported vaccination behavior. Individual risk attitudes were expressed as a continuous variable, from 0 (risk-tolerant) to 10 (risk-averse). ResultsOverall, 69% of GPs reported that they were very favorable toward vaccination in general. Self-reported vaccination coverage was 78% for 2009/2010 seasonal influenza and 62% for A/H1N1 pandemic influenza. Most GPs (72%) reported recommending the pandemic influenza vaccination to at-risk young adults in 2009, but few than half (42%) to young adults not at risk. In multivariate analyses, risk-averse GPs were more often vaccinated against seasonal (marginal effect. = 1.3%, P= 0.02) and pandemic influenza (marginal effect. = 1.5%, P= 0.02). Risk-averse GPs recommended the pandemic influenza vaccination more often than their more risk-tolerant colleagues to patients without risk factors (marginal effect. = 1.7%, P= 0.01), but not to their at-risk patients and were more favorable toward vaccination in general (marginal effect. = 1.5%, P= 0.04). ConclusionIndividual risk attitudes may influence GPs' practices regarding influenza vaccination, both for themselves and their patients. Our results suggest that risk-averse GPs may perceive the risks of influenza to outweigh the potential risks related to the vaccine.
KW - Immunization
KW - Pandemic influenza
KW - Primary care
KW - Risk aversion
KW - Seasonal influenza
KW - Vaccine
U2 - 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.12.038
DO - 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.12.038
M3 - Article
C2 - 25545596
AN - SCOPUS:84921058927
SN - 0264-410X
VL - 33
SP - 610
EP - 614
JO - Vaccine
JF - Vaccine
IS - 5
ER -