Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Current systematic carbon-cycle observations and the need for implementing a policy-relevant carbon observing system

  • P. Ciais
  • , A. J. Dolman
  • , A. Bombelli
  • , R. Duren
  • , A. Peregon
  • , P. J. Rayner
  • , C. Miller
  • , N. Gobron
  • , G. Kinderman
  • , G. Marland
  • , N. Gruber
  • , F. Chevallier
  • , R. J. Andres
  • , G. Balsamo
  • , L. Bopp
  • , F. M. Bréon
  • , G. Broquet
  • , R. Dargaville
  • , T. J. Battin
  • , A. Borges
  • H. Bovensmann, M. Buchwitz, J. Butler, J. G. Canadell, R. B. Cook, R. Defries, R. Engelen, K. R. Gurney, C. Heinze, M. Heimann, A. Held, M. Henry, B. Law, S. Luyssaert, J. Miller, T. Moriyama, C. Moulin, R. B. Myneni, C. Nussli, M. Obersteiner, D. Ojima, Y. Pan, J. D. Paris, S. L. Piao, B. Poulter, S. Plummer, S. Quegan, P. Raymond, M. Reichstein, L. Rivier, C. Sabine, D. Schimel, O. Tarasova, R. Valentini, R. Wang, G. Van Der Werf, D. Wickland, M. Williams, C. Zehner
  • Université Versailles-Saint Quentin
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
  • Euro Mediterranean Center on Climage Change
  • Science Division
  • School of Earth Sciences
  • University of Melbourne
  • Global Environmental Monitoring Unit
  • European Commission Joint Research Centre
  • International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA)
  • Research Institute for Environment, Energy, and Economics
  • Appalachian State University
  • ETH Zurich
  • Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center (CDIAC)
  • Oak Ridge National Laboratory
  • European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts
  • Department of Limnology
  • University of Vienna
  • Chemical Oceanography Unit
  • University of Liège
  • Institute of Environmental Physics (IUP)
  • University of Bremen
  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
  • Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization
  • Department of Geography and Environment
  • Boston University
  • School of Sustainability
  • School of Life Sciences
  • Geophysical Institute
  • University of Bergen
  • Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research
  • Uni Bjerknes Centre
  • Uni Research
  • Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry
  • AusCover Facility
  • Forestry Department
  • Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
  • Department of Forest Ecosystems and Society
  • Oregon State University
  • University of Colorado Boulder
  • Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency
  • Department of Earth and Environment
  • Alcatel Space Industries
  • Natural Resource Ecology Laboratory
  • US Department of Agriculture Forest Service
  • Department of Ecology
  • Tsinghua University
  • ESA Climate Office
  • European Space Agency Andndash
  • Centre for Terrestrial Carbon Dynamics (CTCD)
  • The University of Sheffield
  • Yale University
  • Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory
  • National Ecological Observatory Network
  • World Meteorological Organization
  • GSFC Laboratory for Atmopsheres
  • School of GeoSciences
  • University of Edinburgh
  • ESRIN - ESA Centre for Earth Observation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

214 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A globally integrated carbon observation and analysis system is needed to improve the fundamental understanding of the global carbon cycle, to improve our ability to project future changes, and to verify the effectiveness of policies aiming to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and increase carbon sequestration. Building an integrated carbon observation system requires transformational advances from the existing sparse, exploratory framework towards a dense, robust, and sustained system in all components: anthropogenic emissions, the atmosphere, the ocean, and the terrestrial biosphere. The paper is addressed to scientists, policymakers, and funding agencies who need to have a global picture of the current state of the (diverse) carbon observations. We identify the current state of carbon observations, and the needs and notional requirements for a global integrated carbon observation system that can be built in the next decade. A key conclusion is the substantial expansion of the ground-based observation networks required to reach the high spatial resolution for CO2 and CH4 fluxes, and for carbon stocks for addressing policy-relevant objectives, and attributing flux changes to underlying processes in each region. In order to establish flux and stock diagnostics over areas such as the southern oceans, tropical forests, and the Arctic, in situ observations will have to be complemented with remote-sensing measurements. Remote sensing offers the advantage of dense spatial coverage and frequent revisit. A key challenge is to bring remote-sensing measurements to a level of long-term consistency and accuracy so that they can be efficiently combined in models to reduce uncertainties, in synergy with ground-based data. Bringing tight observational constraints on fossil fuel and land use change emissions will be the biggest challenge for deployment of a policy-relevant integrated carbon observation system. This will require in situ and remotely sensed data at much higher resolution and density than currently achieved for natural fluxes, although over a small land area (cities, industrial sites, power plants), as well as the inclusion of fossil fuel CO2 proxy measurements such as radiocarbon in CO2 and carbon-fuel combustion tracers. Additionally, a policy-relevant carbon monitoring system should also provide mechanisms for reconciling regional top-down (atmosphere-based) and bottom-up (surface-based) flux estimates across the range of spatial and temporal scales relevant to mitigation policies. In addition, uncertainties for each observation data-stream should be assessed. The success of the system will rely on long-term commitments to monitoring, on improved international collaboration to fill gaps in the current observations, on sustained efforts to improve access to the different data streams and make databases interoperable, and on the calibration of each component of the system to agreed-upon international scales.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3547-3602
Number of pages56
JournalBiogeosciences
Volume11
Issue number13
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Jul 2014
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 15 - Life on Land
    SDG 15 Life on Land

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Current systematic carbon-cycle observations and the need for implementing a policy-relevant carbon observing system'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this