Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Declining aerosols in CMIP5 projections: Effects on atmospheric temperature structure and midlatitude jets

  • Leon D. Rotstayn
  • , Emily L. Plymin
  • , Mark A. Collier
  • , Olivier Boucher
  • , Jean Louis Dufresne
  • , Jing Jia Luo
  • , Knut Von Salzen
  • , Stephen J. Jeffrey
  • , Marie Alice Foujols
  • , Yi Ming
  • , Larry W. Horowitz
  • CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research
  • Université Pierre et Marie Curie
  • Bureau of Meteorology Australia
  • University of Victoria
  • Department of Science, Information Technology, Innovation and the Arts
  • Service d'Aéronomie
  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The effects of declining anthropogenic aerosols in representative concentration pathway 4.5 (RCP4.5) are assessed in four models from phase 5 the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5), with a focus on annual, zonal-mean atmospheric temperature structure and zonal winds. For each model, the effect of declining aerosols is diagnosed from the difference between a projection forced by RCP4.5 for 2006-2100 and another that has identical forcing, except that anthropogenic aerosols are fixed at early twenty-first-century levels. The response to declining aerosols is interpreted in terms of the meridional structure of aerosol radiative forcing, which peaks near 40°N and vanishes at the South Pole. Increasing greenhouse gases cause amplified warming in the tropical upper troposphere and strengthening midlatitude jets in both hemispheres. However, for declining aerosols the vertically averaged tropospheric temperature response peaks near 40°N, rather than in the tropics. This implies that for declining aerosols the tropospheric meridional temperature gradient generally increases in the Southern Hemisphere (SH), but in the Northern Hemisphere (NH) it decreases in the tropics and subtropics. Consistent with thermal wind balance, the NH jet then strengthens on its poleward side and weakens on its equatorward side, whereas the SH jet strengthens more than the NH jet. The asymmetric response of the jets is thus consistent with the meridional structure of aerosol radiative forcing and the associated tropospheric warming: in the NH the latitude of maximum warming is roughly collocated with the jet, whereas in the SH warming is strongest in the tropics and weakest at high latitudes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)6960-6977
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Climate
Volume27
Issue number18
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2014

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Declining aerosols in CMIP5 projections: Effects on atmospheric temperature structure and midlatitude jets'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this