TY - GEN
T1 - Delay Measurement of 0-RTT Transport Layer Security (TLS) Handshake Protocol
AU - Goncharskyi, Danylo
AU - Kim, Sung Yong
AU - Serhrouchni, Ahmed
AU - Gu, Pengwenlong
AU - Khatoun, Rida
AU - Hachem, Joel
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 IEEE.
PY - 2022/1/1
Y1 - 2022/1/1
N2 - Transport Layer Security (TLS) 1.3 was normalised in 2018, in which an efficient 0-rtt handshake protocol was proposed. For future 5G networks, the 0-RTT handshake will be a more suitable choice for both secrecy and efficiency. However, 4 years after it was proposed, the 0-rtt handshake protocol is still not widely accepted by network service providers due to concerns about its ability to resist replay attacks. In order to address this issue, many solutions have be proposed in the past few year but all of them will increase the complexity and overhead of the 0-RTT protocol. In this paper, we focus on testing whether the 0-RTT handshake protocol is supported by service providers, and testing its performance in a real network environment to verify whether it can withstand continuous optimization in terms of security. Test results show that with 0-RTT, the server received the first application data up to 37 time faster than the 1-RTT and up to 83 time faster than 2-RTT. However, at the client side, the performance of 0-RTT protocol is virtually the same as 1-RTT, as predicted.
AB - Transport Layer Security (TLS) 1.3 was normalised in 2018, in which an efficient 0-rtt handshake protocol was proposed. For future 5G networks, the 0-RTT handshake will be a more suitable choice for both secrecy and efficiency. However, 4 years after it was proposed, the 0-rtt handshake protocol is still not widely accepted by network service providers due to concerns about its ability to resist replay attacks. In order to address this issue, many solutions have be proposed in the past few year but all of them will increase the complexity and overhead of the 0-RTT protocol. In this paper, we focus on testing whether the 0-RTT handshake protocol is supported by service providers, and testing its performance in a real network environment to verify whether it can withstand continuous optimization in terms of security. Test results show that with 0-RTT, the server received the first application data up to 37 time faster than the 1-RTT and up to 83 time faster than 2-RTT. However, at the client side, the performance of 0-RTT protocol is virtually the same as 1-RTT, as predicted.
KW - 0-rtt handshake protocol
KW - Benchmarking
KW - Early data
KW - Performance measurement
KW - Transport Layer Security
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85134336054
U2 - 10.1109/CoDIT55151.2022.9803984
DO - 10.1109/CoDIT55151.2022.9803984
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85134336054
T3 - 2022 8th International Conference on Control, Decision and Information Technologies, CoDIT 2022
SP - 1450
EP - 1454
BT - 2022 8th International Conference on Control, Decision and Information Technologies, CoDIT 2022
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 8th International Conference on Control, Decision and Information Technologies, CoDIT 2022
Y2 - 17 May 2022 through 20 May 2022
ER -