Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Dependent types and multi-monadic effects in F∗

  • Nikhil Swamy
  • , Cətəlin Hriţcu
  • , Chantal Keller
  • , Aseem Rastogi
  • , Antoine Delignat-Lavaud
  • , Simon Forest
  • , Karthikeyan Bhargavan
  • , Cédric Fournet
  • , Pierre Yves Strub
  • , Markulf Kohlweiss
  • , Jean Karim Zinzindohoue
  • , Santiago Zanella-Béguelin
  • Microsoft Research
  • INRIA Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique
  • MSR-INRIA
  • UMD
  • PSL research University & IPSL
  • IMDEA Software Institute

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution › peer-review

242 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We present a new, completely redesigned, version of F∗, a language that works both as a proof assistant as well as a general-purpose, verification-oriented, effectful programming language. In support of these complementary roles, F∗ is a dependently typed, higher-order, call-by-value language with primitive effects including state, exceptions, divergence and IO. Although primitive, programmers choose the granularity at which to specify effects by equipping each effect with a monadic, predicate transformer semantics. F∗ uses this to efficiently compute weakest preconditions and discharges the resulting proof obligations using a combination of SMT solving and manual proofs. Isolated from the effects, the core of F∗ is a language of pure functions used to write specifications and proof terms-its consistency is maintained by a semantic termination check based on a well-founded order. We evaluate our design on more than 55, 000 lines of F∗ we have authored in the last year, focusing on three main case studies. Showcasing its use as a general-purpose programming language, F∗ is programmed (but not verified) in F∗, and bootstraps in both OCaml and F#. Our experience confirms F∗'s pay-as-you-go cost model: writing idiomatic ML-like code with no finer specifications imposes no user burden. As a verification-oriented language, our most significant evaluation of F∗ is in verifying several key modules in an implementation of the TLS-1.2 protocol standard. For the modules we considered, we are able to prove more properties, with fewer annotations using F∗ than in a prior verified implementation of TLS-1.2. Finally, as a proof assistant, we discuss our use of F∗ in mechanizing the metatheory of a range of lambda calculi, starting from the simply typed lambda calculus to System Fw and even μF∗, a sizeable fragment of F∗ itself-these proofs make essential use of F∗'s flexible combination of SMT automation and constructive proofs, enabling a tactic-free style of programming and proving at a relatively large scale.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationPOPL 2016 - Proceedings of the 43rd Annual ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages
EditorsRupak Majumdar, Rastislav Bodik
PublisherAssociation for Computing Machinery
Pages256-270
Number of pages15
ISBN (Electronic)9781450335492
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 11 Jan 2016
Externally publishedYes
Event43rd Annual ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages, POPL 2016 - St. Petersburg, United States
Duration: 20 Jan 2016 → 22 Jan 2016

Publication series

NameConference Record of the Annual ACM Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages
Volume20-22-January-2016
ISSN (Print)0730-8566

Conference

Conference43rd Annual ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages, POPL 2016
Country/TerritoryUnited States
CitySt. Petersburg
Period20/01/16 → 22/01/16

Keywords

  • Effectful programming
  • Proof assistants
  • Verification

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Dependent types and multi-monadic effects in F∗'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this