Development of a generic voter under focal

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

Abstract

Safety and security are claimed major concerns by the formal FoCal development environment. In [7] we introduced a safety development cycle customised to FoCal. In this paper, we examine how to specify and implement a concrete example following this cycle. We show that indeed it is feasible and we present how FoCal features fit with software best practises like modularity, reuse, fault confinement and maintenance.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationTests and Proofs - Third International Conference, TAP 2009, Proceedings
Pages10-26
Number of pages17
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Nov 2009
Externally publishedYes
Event3rd International Conference on Tests and Proofs, TAP 2009 - Zurich, Switzerland
Duration: 2 Jul 20093 Jul 2009

Publication series

NameLecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)
Volume5668 LNCS
ISSN (Print)0302-9743
ISSN (Electronic)1611-3349

Conference

Conference3rd International Conference on Tests and Proofs, TAP 2009
Country/TerritorySwitzerland
CityZurich
Period2/07/093/07/09

Keywords

  • Development cycle
  • FoCal
  • Formal methods
  • Voter

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Development of a generic voter under focal'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this