Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Diagnosing destabilization risk in global land carbon sinks

  • Marcos Fernández-Martínez
  • , Josep Peñuelas
  • , Frederic Chevallier
  • , Philippe Ciais
  • , Michael Obersteiner
  • , Christian Rödenbeck
  • , Jordi Sardans
  • , Sara Vicca
  • , Hui Yang
  • , Stephen Sitch
  • , Pierre Friedlingstein
  • , Vivek K. Arora
  • , Daniel S. Goll
  • , Atul K. Jain
  • , Danica L. Lombardozzi
  • , Patrick C. McGuire
  • , Ivan A. Janssens
  • University of Antwerp
  • CREAF, Cerdanyola Del Vallès
  • University of Barcelona
  • Université Versailles-Saint Quentin
  • International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA)
  • University of Oxford
  • Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry
  • University of Exeter
  • Meteorological Research Branch
  • University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
  • National Center for Atmospheric Research
  • University of Reading

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Global net land carbon uptake or net biome production (NBP) has increased during recent decades1. Whether its temporal variability and autocorrelation have changed during this period, however, remains elusive, even though an increase in both could indicate an increased potential for a destabilized carbon sink2,3. Here, we investigate the trends and controls of net terrestrial carbon uptake and its temporal variability and autocorrelation from 1981 to 2018 using two atmospheric-inversion models, the amplitude of the seasonal cycle of atmospheric CO2 concentration derived from nine monitoring stations distributed across the Pacific Ocean and dynamic global vegetation models. We find that annual NBP and its interdecadal variability increased globally whereas temporal autocorrelation decreased. We observe a separation of regions characterized by increasingly variable NBP, associated with warm regions and increasingly variable temperatures, lower and weaker positive trends in NBP and regions where NBP became stronger and less variable. Plant species richness presented a concave-down parabolic spatial relationship with NBP and its variability at the global scale whereas nitrogen deposition generally increased NBP. Increasing temperature and its increasing variability appear as the most important drivers of declining and increasingly variable NBP. Our results show increasing variability of NBP regionally that can be mostly attributed to climate change and that may point to destabilization of the coupled carbon–climate system.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)848-853
Number of pages6
JournalNature
Volume615
Issue number7954
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Mar 2023
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 13 - Climate Action
    SDG 13 Climate Action
  2. SDG 14 - Life Below Water
    SDG 14 Life Below Water
  3. SDG 15 - Life on Land
    SDG 15 Life on Land

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Diagnosing destabilization risk in global land carbon sinks'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this