Abstract
The number of stormwater source control (SC) regulations adopted by local authorities is rapidly growing in many countries. We can expect that, in the near future, the hydrologic behavior of many urban and periurban catchments will reflect this diffusion. This paper discusses SC regulations through two complementary approaches: starting on three French case-studies, it analyzes how regulations are developed today and identifies a set of shortcuts in policy-making practices. Then, the hydrologic model of a periurban catchment in the Paris region is used to test the impacts that these regulations can produce if widely applied. The main finding is that inertia in policy-making, driving a singular focus on flow-rate based regulations, can produce negative impacts in the long-term. Further efforts on volume-based regulations are advocated, both in terms of research and policy-making.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 188-200 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Journal of Hydrology |
| Volume | 485 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2 Apr 2013 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Best management practices
- Distributed modeling
- Policy analysis
- Source control
- Storm drainage
- Urban hydrology
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Do stormwater source control policies deliver the right hydrologic outcomes?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver