Does Status Always Matter? The Effect of Brand Concept on the Effectiveness of Hierarchical and Linear Structures of Loyalty Programs

Aida Mimouni Chaabane, Virginie Pez Perard

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

Academics and managers tend to assert that hierarchical loyalty program structures, which classify customers into tiers on the basis of spending levels or other purchase activities, are more effective than linear structures without tiers, in which all members belong to the same strata. The present article questions this claim by examining the moderating role of brand concept. Building on the congruence principle, two studies—a survey involving various empirical contexts and an experiment conducted in the banking sector—reveal that the effect of perceived congruence between the program structure and the brand concept is asymmetrical. For symbolic brands, hierarchical loyalty program structures appear more congruent, which increases loyalty intentions. In contrast, for functional brands, both hierarchical and linear loyalty program structures seem equally congruent. The findings enrich the general debate about loyalty program designs and provide practical guidance to brand and loyalty program managers.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationDevelopments in Marketing Science
Subtitle of host publicationProceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science
PublisherSpringer Nature
Pages499-511
Number of pages13
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2017
Externally publishedYes

Publication series

NameDevelopments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science
ISSN (Print)2363-6165
ISSN (Electronic)2363-6173

Keywords

  • Functional brand concept
  • Hierarchical loyalty program structure
  • Linear loyalty program structure
  • Perceived congruence
  • Symbolic brand concept

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Does Status Always Matter? The Effect of Brand Concept on the Effectiveness of Hierarchical and Linear Structures of Loyalty Programs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this