Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Economic assessment of increasing tree cover in Kenya: The cost of maintaining forest contiguity

  • CIRED

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

As strategies to increase forest cover become more widespread as part of countries' environmental commitments, assessing the trade-offs between economic and environmental aspects of forestry activities is an increasingly pressing issue. This article addresses this question by assessing the cost-effectiveness of increasing forest cover under different land use management strategies that differ in their environmental and economic focus. Our analysis is conducted at the national level in Kenya, a country known for its ambitious environmental policies. Our findings show that prioritizing forest contiguity has a higher economic impact than targeting areas with the lowest opportunity costs, and significantly reduces the cost-effective mitigation potential when applied strictly. In addition, our results suggest that land use strategies affect the shape of the land opportunity cost and marginal abatement cost curves, which may exhibit decreasing and non-convex shapes. Overall, this paper argues that careful consideration of land management systems for increasing forest cover is essential to achieve an optimal balance between environmental benefits and economic costs.

Original languageEnglish
Article number108649
JournalEcological Economics
Volume235
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sept 2025
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 13 - Climate Action
    SDG 13 Climate Action
  2. SDG 15 - Life on Land
    SDG 15 Life on Land

Keywords

  • Afforestation
  • Carbon
  • Climate change
  • Cost-effectiveness
  • Land-use change
  • Reforestation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Economic assessment of increasing tree cover in Kenya: The cost of maintaining forest contiguity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this