Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Equilibrium selection: Payoff or risk dominance?. The case of the "weakest link"

  • University of Chicago
  • University of Montpellier (UMR MiVEGEC)

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

When a game has more than one Nash equilibrium, a coordination issue arises. Pareto and risk dominations are two available criteria to select one of them. There is a debate on how to use these criteria when they point in different directions. We study the first wave of the Weakest Link show broadcast in France to generate field data on this issue. Observed behavior can be rationalized in terms of Pareto and risk-domination. The payoff-dominant equilibrium is selected if it is not too risky otherwise players coordinate themselves according to risk-dominance. This rationalization is in line with the experimental literature.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)164-181
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Economic Behavior and Organization
Volume60
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2006
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Coordination
  • Field experiment
  • Game show
  • Pareto and risk domination
  • Vote

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Equilibrium selection: Payoff or risk dominance?. The case of the "weakest link"'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this