Abstract
From our paper, one might expect that the u < d condition on extremal surfaces is necessary and sufficient for holographic scattering in all pure states under consideration. In this erratum, we would like to emphasize a small caveat to this statement.1 onsider a defect geometry with |M| > 1/4. Due to the effect discussed in figure 25, there exist configurations of boundary regions such that the u candidate does not exist. In such cases, it does not make sense to say that the u < d relation controls holographic scattering. (Indeed, one can check in examples that the absence of u is consistent with both scattering and not-scattering.) In Version 2 of our paper on the arXiv, we have added explanations of this point in footnote 3 on page 8, at the bottom of page 10, and in footnote 9 on page 21.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 119 |
| Journal | Journal of High Energy Physics |
| Volume | 2025 |
| Issue number | 8 |
| DOIs |
|
| Publication status | Published - 1 Aug 2025 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Erratum to: Holographic scattering and non-minimal RT surfaces (Journal of High Energy Physics, (2024), 2024, 10, (119), 10.1007/JHEP10(2024)119)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver