Evaluation of routing protocols for VANETS in urban environments

Nedal Ababneh; Houda Labiod; Nadia Boukhatem

doi:10.1109/SARNOF.2010.5469808

Evaluation of routing protocols for VANETS in urban environments

Nedal Ababneh
, Houda Labiod
, Nadia Boukhatem

Telecom Paris

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution › peer-review

Abstract

The past few years have seen an increasing interest in the development of vehicular ad hoc networks resulting in many routing protocols proposals. This paper presents the results of a detailed performance evaluation of three of these protocols selected from different categories: geographic routing (i.e., GPSR), geographic opportunistic routing (i.e., GOSR), and trajectory based routing (i.e., SIFT). We used VanetMobiSim/NS-2 simulation environment to compare the protocols performance under different node densities, speed and distance between source and destination nodes in urban traffic scenarios. We further extend SIFT to enable vehicle to infrastructure communications and show that it outperforms the other studied routing protocols for most of the performance metrics used in this paper.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	33rd IEEE Sarnoff Symposium 2010, Conference Proceedings
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1109/SARNOF.2010.5469808
Publication status	Published - 29 Jun 2010
Event	33rd IEEE Sarnoff Symposium 2010 - Princeton, NJ, United States Duration: 12 Apr 2010 → 14 Apr 2010

Publication series

Name	33rd IEEE Sarnoff Symposium 2010, Conference Proceedings

Conference

Conference	33rd IEEE Sarnoff Symposium 2010
Country/Territory	United States
City	Princeton, NJ
Period	12/04/10 → 14/04/10

Keywords

Mobility model
Network simulation
Performance evaluation
Routing protocols
Vehicular ad hoc network

Access to Document

10.1109/SARNOF.2010.5469808

Cite this

@inproceedings{385c6cf4afaf4c3fa76677b7ab0ff449,

title = "Evaluation of routing protocols for VANETS in urban environments",

abstract = "The past few years have seen an increasing interest in the development of vehicular ad hoc networks resulting in many routing protocols proposals. This paper presents the results of a detailed performance evaluation of three of these protocols selected from different categories: geographic routing (i.e., GPSR), geographic opportunistic routing (i.e., GOSR), and trajectory based routing (i.e., SIFT). We used VanetMobiSim/NS-2 simulation environment to compare the protocols performance under different node densities, speed and distance between source and destination nodes in urban traffic scenarios. We further extend SIFT to enable vehicle to infrastructure communications and show that it outperforms the other studied routing protocols for most of the performance metrics used in this paper.",

keywords = "Mobility model, Network simulation, Performance evaluation, Routing protocols, Vehicular ad hoc network",

author = "Nedal Ababneh and Houda Labiod and Nadia Boukhatem",

year = "2010",

month = jun,

day = "29",

doi = "10.1109/SARNOF.2010.5469808",

language = "English",

isbn = "9781424455935",

series = "33rd IEEE Sarnoff Symposium 2010, Conference Proceedings",

booktitle = "33rd IEEE Sarnoff Symposium 2010, Conference Proceedings",

note = "33rd IEEE Sarnoff Symposium 2010 ; Conference date: 12-04-2010 Through 14-04-2010",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Evaluation of routing protocols for VANETS in urban environments

AU - Ababneh, Nedal

AU - Labiod, Houda

AU - Boukhatem, Nadia

PY - 2010/6/29

Y1 - 2010/6/29

N2 - The past few years have seen an increasing interest in the development of vehicular ad hoc networks resulting in many routing protocols proposals. This paper presents the results of a detailed performance evaluation of three of these protocols selected from different categories: geographic routing (i.e., GPSR), geographic opportunistic routing (i.e., GOSR), and trajectory based routing (i.e., SIFT). We used VanetMobiSim/NS-2 simulation environment to compare the protocols performance under different node densities, speed and distance between source and destination nodes in urban traffic scenarios. We further extend SIFT to enable vehicle to infrastructure communications and show that it outperforms the other studied routing protocols for most of the performance metrics used in this paper.

AB - The past few years have seen an increasing interest in the development of vehicular ad hoc networks resulting in many routing protocols proposals. This paper presents the results of a detailed performance evaluation of three of these protocols selected from different categories: geographic routing (i.e., GPSR), geographic opportunistic routing (i.e., GOSR), and trajectory based routing (i.e., SIFT). We used VanetMobiSim/NS-2 simulation environment to compare the protocols performance under different node densities, speed and distance between source and destination nodes in urban traffic scenarios. We further extend SIFT to enable vehicle to infrastructure communications and show that it outperforms the other studied routing protocols for most of the performance metrics used in this paper.

KW - Mobility model

KW - Network simulation

KW - Performance evaluation

KW - Routing protocols

KW - Vehicular ad hoc network

U2 - 10.1109/SARNOF.2010.5469808

DO - 10.1109/SARNOF.2010.5469808

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:77953883003

SN - 9781424455935

T3 - 33rd IEEE Sarnoff Symposium 2010, Conference Proceedings

BT - 33rd IEEE Sarnoff Symposium 2010, Conference Proceedings

T2 - 33rd IEEE Sarnoff Symposium 2010

Y2 - 12 April 2010 through 14 April 2010

ER -

Evaluation of routing protocols for VANETS in urban environments

Abstract

Publication series

Conference

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this