Evidence of Three-Dimensional Asymmetries Seeded by High-Density Carbon-Ablator Nonuniformity in Experiments at the National Ignition Facility

  • D. T. Casey
  • , B. J. MacGowan
  • , J. D. Sater
  • , A. B. Zylstra
  • , O. L. Landen
  • , J. Milovich
  • , O. A. Hurricane
  • , A. L. Kritcher
  • , M. Hohenberger
  • , K. Baker
  • , S. Le Pape
  • , T. Döppner
  • , C. Weber
  • , H. Huang
  • , C. Kong
  • , J. Biener
  • , C. V. Young
  • , S. Haan
  • , R. C. Nora
  • , S. Ross
  • H. Robey, M. Stadermann, A. Nikroo, D. A. Callahan, R. M. Bionta, K. D. Hahn, A. S. Moore, D. Schlossberg, M. Bruhn, K. Sequoia, N. Rice, M. Farrell, C. Wild

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Inertial confinement fusion implosions must achieve high in-flight shell velocity, sufficient energy coupling between the hot spot and imploding shell, and high areal density (ρR=∫ρdr) at stagnation. Asymmetries in ρR degrade the coupling of shell kinetic energy to the hot spot and reduce the confinement of that energy. We present the first evidence that nonuniformity in the ablator shell thickness (∼0.5% of the total thickness) in high-density carbon experiments isa significant cause for observed 3D ρR asymmetries at the National Ignition Facility. These shell-thickness nonuniformities have significantly impacted some recent experiments leading to ρR asymmetries on the order of ∼25% of the average ρR and hot spot velocities of ∼100 km/s. This work reveals the origin of a significant implosion performance degradation in ignition experiments and places stringent new requirements on capsule thickness metrology and symmetry.

Original languageEnglish
Article number025002
JournalPhysical Review Letters
Volume126
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 12 Jan 2021
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evidence of Three-Dimensional Asymmetries Seeded by High-Density Carbon-Ablator Nonuniformity in Experiments at the National Ignition Facility'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this