Abstract
In proof theory one distinguishes sequent proofs with cut and cut-free sequent proofs, while for proof complexity one distinguishes Frege systems and extended Frege systems. In this paper we show how deep inference can provide a uniform treatment for both classifications, such that we can define cut-free systems with extension, which is neither possible with Frege systems, nor with the sequent calculus. We show that the propositional pigeonhole principle admits polynomial-size proofs in a cut-free system with extension. We also define cut-free systems with substitution and show that the cut-free system with extension p-simulates the cut-free system with substitution.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1995-2007 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Annals of Pure and Applied Logic |
| Volume | 163 |
| Issue number | 12 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Dec 2012 |
Keywords
- Balanced tautologies
- Cut elimination
- Deep inference
- Frege systems
- Proof complexity
- Propositional pigeonhole principle