Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Future air quality in Europe: A multi-model assessment of projected exposure to ozone

  • A. Colette
  • , C. Granier
  • , Hodnebrog
  • , H. Jakobs
  • , A. Maurizi
  • , A. Nyiri
  • , S. Rao
  • , M. Amann
  • , B. Bessagnet
  • , A. D'Angiola
  • , M. Gauss
  • , C. Heyes
  • , Z. Klimont
  • , F. Meleux
  • , M. Memmesheimer
  • , A. Mieville
  • , L. Rouïl
  • , F. Russo
  • , S. Schucht
  • , D. Simpson
  • F. Stordal, F. Tampieri, M. Vrac
  • INERIS Institut National de l'Environnement Industriel et des Risques
  • Sorbonne Université
  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
  • University of Colorado Boulder
  • Max Planck Institute for Meteorology
  • University of Oslo
  • Center for International Climate Research (CICERO)
  • FRIUUK
  • Institute of Atmospheric Sciences and Climate, CNR, ISAC
  • Norwegian Meteorological Institute
  • International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA)
  • Laboratoire d'Aérologie
  • Chalmers University of Technology
  • ENEA-Bologna
  • UVSQ

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

61 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In order to explore future air quality in Europe at the 2030 horizon, two emission scenarios developed in the framework of the Global Energy Assessment including varying assumptions on climate and energy access policies are investigated with an ensemble of six regional and global atmospheric chemistry transport models.

A specific focus is given in the paper to the assessment of uncertainties and robustness of the projected changes in air quality. The present work relies on an ensemble of chemistry transport models giving insight into the model spread. Both regional and global scale models were involved, so that the ensemble benefits from medium-resolution approaches as well as global models that capture long-range transport. For each scenario a whole decade is modelled in order to gain statistical confidence in the results. A statistical downscaling approach is used to correct the distribution of the modelled projection. Last, the modelling experiment is related to a hind-cast study published earlier, where the performances of all participating models were extensively documented. The analysis is presented in an exposure-based framework in order to discuss policy relevant changes. According to the emission projections, ozone precursors such as NOx will drop down to 30% to 50% of their current levels, depending on the scenario. As a result, annual mean O3 will slightly increase in NOx saturated areas but the overall O3 burden will decrease substantially. Exposure to detrimental O3 levels for health (SOMO35) will be reduced down to 45% to 70% of their current levels. And the fraction of stations where present-day exceedences of daily maximum O3 is higher than 120 μg m-3 more than 25 days per year will drop from 43% down to 2 to 8%. We conclude that air pollution mitigation measures (present in both scenarios) are the main factors leading to the improvement, but an additional cobenefit of at least 40% (depending on the indicator) is brought about by the climate policy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)10613-10630
Number of pages18
JournalAtmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Volume12
Issue number21
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2012
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energy
    SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy
  2. SDG 13 - Climate Action
    SDG 13 Climate Action

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Future air quality in Europe: A multi-model assessment of projected exposure to ozone'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this