Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Global trends and practice patterns in virtual reality simulation training for ophthalmic surgery: an international survey use of virtual reality simulation training around the world

  • Lea Dormegny
  • , Remi Yaïci
  • , Emilia Koestel
  • , Sorcha Ní Dhubhghaill
  • , Chetan Ahiwalay
  • , Ashish Bacchav
  • , Jean Louis Bourges
  • , Gauthier Dechriste
  • , H. Burkhard Dick
  • , Helena Prior Filipe
  • , Elias Flockerzi
  • , David Gaucher
  • , Van Charles Lansingh
  • , Pamela Gonzalez
  • , Bonnie An Henderson
  • , Salome Kuntz
  • , Rindra Rafanomezantsoa
  • , Jean Marie Andre
  • , Guillermo Rocha
  • , Antoine Rousseau
  • Arnaud Sauer, Marion Schaeffer, Berthold Seitz, Lauriana Solecki, Ann Sofia Skou Thomsen, Nabil Chakfe, Anne Lejay, Tristan Bourcier
  • Strasbourg University Hospital
  • Gepromed
  • Vrjie Universiteit Brussel
  • Aravind Eye Hospital
  • Pôle Gérontologie
  • Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers
  • University Eye Hospital Bochum
  • hôpital Egas Moniz
  • Saarland University
  • HMS
  • Instituto Mexicano de Oftalmología
  • University of Miami Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine
  • University of Utah School of Medicine
  • Tufts University School of Medicine
  • CHRU Strasbourg
  • Ampefiloha University Hospital
  • McGill University
  • Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris
  • Rigshospitalet
  • Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation (CAMES)
  • University of Copenhagen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This global survey investigated the use of virtual reality simulation (VRS) in ophthalmological surgery education. Questionnaires were distributed to authors of publications and directors of centers using VRS for surgical education in ophthalmology, then forwarded to residents and fellows of their team for completion. Out of 1845 questionnaires sent across 36 countries, 170 responses from 26 countries were analyzed, primarily from residents and fellows (75%). Mean access duration to VRS was 3.6 years, often at University Hospitals (43.5%). Notably, 12% of respondents traveled an average of 550 km to access VRS. The EyeSi VR Magic was the most frequently reported simulator (80%, mainly in Europe/North America), followed by HelpMeSee (48%, primarily in Europe/India/Madagascar). In 25 training centers across 12 countries, VRS was a mandatory prerequisite for patient access, functioning as a “surgical license”. A larger number of training centers (49 from 19 countries) favored such mandatory training. Junior surgeons perceived a greater impact of VRS on their surgical practice compared to senior surgeons (p = 0.032). The study concludes that while VRS holds a significant role in postgraduate ophthalmic surgical training, its access is unequal worldwide. Broader implementation and standardized practices could improve and maintain high educational standards in this field.

Original languageEnglish
Article number30886
JournalScientific Reports
Volume15
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2025
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Competency-based medical education
  • Ophthalmology curriculum
  • Ophthalmology residents
  • Surgical education
  • Virtual reality simulator

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Global trends and practice patterns in virtual reality simulation training for ophthalmic surgery: an international survey use of virtual reality simulation training around the world'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this