TY - GEN
T1 - Higher-Order approximate relational refinement types for mechanism design and differential privacy
AU - Barthe, Gilles
AU - Gaboardi, Marco
AU - Arias, Emilio Jesús Gallego
AU - Hsu, Justin
AU - Roth, Aaron
AU - Strub, Pierre Yves
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2015 by the Association for Computing Machinery, Inc. (ACM).
PY - 2015/1/14
Y1 - 2015/1/14
N2 - Mechanism design is the study of algorithm design where the inputs to the algorithm are controlled by strategic agents, who must be incentivized to faithfully report them. Unlike typical programmatic properties, it is not sufficient for algorithms to merely satisfy the property-incentive properties are only useful if the strategic agents also believe this fact. Verification is an attractive way to convince agents that the incentive properties actually hold, but mechanism design poses several unique challenges: interesting properties can be sophisticated relational properties of probabilistic computations involving expected values, and mechanisms may rely on other probabilistic properties, like differential privacy, to achieve their goals. We introduce a relational refinement type system, called HOARe2, for verifying mechanism design and differential privacy. We show that HOARe2 is sound w.r.t. a denotational semantics, and correctly models (ε,δ)-differential privacy; moreover, we show that it subsumes DFuzz, an existing linear dependent type system for differential privacy. Finally, we develop an SMT-based implementation of HOARe2 and use it to verify challenging examples of mechanism design, including auctions and aggregative games, and new proposed examples from differential privacy.
AB - Mechanism design is the study of algorithm design where the inputs to the algorithm are controlled by strategic agents, who must be incentivized to faithfully report them. Unlike typical programmatic properties, it is not sufficient for algorithms to merely satisfy the property-incentive properties are only useful if the strategic agents also believe this fact. Verification is an attractive way to convince agents that the incentive properties actually hold, but mechanism design poses several unique challenges: interesting properties can be sophisticated relational properties of probabilistic computations involving expected values, and mechanisms may rely on other probabilistic properties, like differential privacy, to achieve their goals. We introduce a relational refinement type system, called HOARe2, for verifying mechanism design and differential privacy. We show that HOARe2 is sound w.r.t. a denotational semantics, and correctly models (ε,δ)-differential privacy; moreover, we show that it subsumes DFuzz, an existing linear dependent type system for differential privacy. Finally, we develop an SMT-based implementation of HOARe2 and use it to verify challenging examples of mechanism design, including auctions and aggregative games, and new proposed examples from differential privacy.
KW - Probabilistic programming
KW - Program logics
U2 - 10.1145/2676726.2677000
DO - 10.1145/2676726.2677000
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84939489400
T3 - Conference Record of the Annual ACM Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages
SP - 55
EP - 68
BT - POPL 2015 - Proceedings of the 42nd Annual ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages
PB - Association for Computing Machinery
T2 - 42nd Annual ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages, POPL 2015
Y2 - 12 January 2015 through 18 January 2015
ER -