TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact of solid road barriers on reactive pollutant dispersion in an idealized urban canyon
T2 - A large-eddy simulation coupled with chemistry
AU - Lin, Chao
AU - Ooka, Ryozo
AU - Kikumoto, Hideki
AU - Flageul, Cédric
AU - Kim, Youngseob
AU - Zhang, Yang
AU - Sartelet, Karine
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2024/5/1
Y1 - 2024/5/1
N2 - This study conducts chemistry-coupled large-eddy simulations on reactive gaseous and particulate pollutant dispersions in an idealized street canyon. Four road-barrier configurations are considered: barrier-free, side barriers, center barrier, and the combination of side and center barriers. Regarding the formation of secondary aerosols, the center barrier reduces the canyon-averaged mass concentration of particulate matter (PM) but increases the inorganic particle concentration. This is because nitric acid (HNO3) is limited in the formation of ammonium nitrate due to the long residence time in the street, and the center barrier increases the HNO3 inflow from the background air. The side barriers increase the canyon-averaged PM10 mass concentration but reduce PM number concentration due to sufficient time for coagulation. Using combined barriers reduces the most PM10 mass concentration and number concentration from the barrier-free case. Regarding the formation of secondary gases, the side barriers enhance the NO2 formation due to the worse ventilation. In contrast, the center barrier largely reduces the canyon-averaged NO concentration but slightly reduces the NO2 concentration from the barrier-free case, because the center barrier increases the O3 inflow from the background air favoring NO2 formation. Additionally, the combined barriers show smaller canyon-averaged NO2 and O3 concentrations than the center barrier. From the view of controlling reactive pollutants, urban planners are recommended to apply the combined barriers to enhance better air quality in street canyons, rather than using either side barriers or a center barrier alone.
AB - This study conducts chemistry-coupled large-eddy simulations on reactive gaseous and particulate pollutant dispersions in an idealized street canyon. Four road-barrier configurations are considered: barrier-free, side barriers, center barrier, and the combination of side and center barriers. Regarding the formation of secondary aerosols, the center barrier reduces the canyon-averaged mass concentration of particulate matter (PM) but increases the inorganic particle concentration. This is because nitric acid (HNO3) is limited in the formation of ammonium nitrate due to the long residence time in the street, and the center barrier increases the HNO3 inflow from the background air. The side barriers increase the canyon-averaged PM10 mass concentration but reduce PM number concentration due to sufficient time for coagulation. Using combined barriers reduces the most PM10 mass concentration and number concentration from the barrier-free case. Regarding the formation of secondary gases, the side barriers enhance the NO2 formation due to the worse ventilation. In contrast, the center barrier largely reduces the canyon-averaged NO concentration but slightly reduces the NO2 concentration from the barrier-free case, because the center barrier increases the O3 inflow from the background air favoring NO2 formation. Additionally, the combined barriers show smaller canyon-averaged NO2 and O3 concentrations than the center barrier. From the view of controlling reactive pollutants, urban planners are recommended to apply the combined barriers to enhance better air quality in street canyons, rather than using either side barriers or a center barrier alone.
KW - Aerosol dynamics
KW - Barrier
KW - Chemical reaction
KW - LES
KW - Pollutant dispersion
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85194847744
U2 - 10.1016/j.uclim.2024.101989
DO - 10.1016/j.uclim.2024.101989
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85194847744
SN - 2212-0955
VL - 55
JO - Urban Climate
JF - Urban Climate
M1 - 101989
ER -