Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Inferring epistasis from genomic data with comparable mutation and outcrossing rate

  • Hong Li Zeng
  • , Eugenio Mauri
  • , Vito Dichio
  • , Simona Cocco
  • , Rémi Monasson
  • , Erik Aurell
  • Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications
  • PSL research University & IPSL
  • Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière (ICM)
  • INRIA Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique
  • Sorbonne Université
  • AlbaNova University Center

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We consider a population evolving due to mutation, selection and recombination, where selection includes single-locus terms (additive fitness) and two-loci terms (pairwise epistatic fitness). We further consider the problem of inferring fitness in the evolutionary dynamics from one or several snapshots of the distribution of genotypes in the population. In recent literature, this has been done by applying the quasi-linkage equilibrium regime, first obtained by Kimura in the limit of high recombination. Here, we show that the approach also works in the interesting regime where the effects of mutations are comparable to or larger than recombination. This leads to a modified main epistatic fitness inference formula where the rates of mutation and recombination occur together. We also derive this formula using by a previously developed Gaussian closure that formally remains valid when recombination is absent. The findings are validated through numerical simulations.

Original languageEnglish
Article number083501
JournalJournal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment
Volume2021
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2021

Keywords

  • Computational biology
  • Evolutionary and comparative genomics
  • Population dynamics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Inferring epistasis from genomic data with comparable mutation and outcrossing rate'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this