Initiation and propagation of complex 3D networks of cracks in heterogeneous quasi-brittle materials: Direct comparison between in situ testing-microCT experiments and phase field simulations

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

We provide the first direct comparisons, to our knowledge, of complex 3D micro cracking initiation and propagation in heterogeneous quasi-brittle materials modelled by the phase field numerical method and observed in X-ray microtomography images recorded during in situ mechanical testing. Some material parameters of the damage model, including the process zone (internal) length, are identified by an inverse approach combining experimental data and 3D simulations. A new technique is developed to study the micro cracking at a finer scale by prescribing the local displacements measured by digital volume correlation over the boundary of a small sub-volume inside the sample during the numerical simulations. The comparisons, performed on several samples of lightweight plaster and concrete, show a remarkable quantitative agreement between the 3D crack morphology obtained by the model and by the experiments, without any a priori knowledge about the location of the initiation of the cracks in the numerical model. The results indicate that the crack paths can be predicted in a fully deterministic way in spite of the highly random geometry of the microstructure and the brittle nature of its constituents.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)320-350
Number of pages31
JournalJournal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids
Volume95
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2016
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Digital volume correlation
  • Gradient damage model
  • Heterogeneous material
  • In situ testing
  • Micro cracking
  • Phase-field method
  • Quasi-brittle
  • Voxel-based models
  • X-ray microtomography

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Initiation and propagation of complex 3D networks of cracks in heterogeneous quasi-brittle materials: Direct comparison between in situ testing-microCT experiments and phase field simulations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this