Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Interobserver agreement issues in radiology

  • INSERM U869
  • Laboratoire de Probabilités et Modèles Aléatoires
  • ENSAE
  • Université de Montpellier 2
  • Sorbonne Université
  • Pôle de Biologie
  • Pôle Gérontologie

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Agreement between observers (i.e., inter-rater agreement) can be quantified with various criteria but their appropriate selections are critical. When the measure is qualitative (nominal or ordinal), the proportion of agreement or the kappa coefficient should be used to evaluate inter-rater consistency (i.e., inter-rater reliability). The kappa coefficient is more meaningful that the raw percentage of agreement, because the latter does not account for agreements due to chance alone. When the measures are quantitative, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) should be used to assess agreement but this should be done with care because there are different ICCs so that it is important to describe the model and type of ICC being used. The Bland-Altman method can be used to assess consistency and conformity but its use should be restricted to comparison of two raters.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)639-641
Number of pages3
JournalDiagnostic and Interventional Imaging
Volume101
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2020
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Interobserver agreement
  • Intraclass correlation coefficient
  • Kappa test
  • Radiology
  • Reproducibility of results

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Interobserver agreement issues in radiology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this