TY - GEN
T1 - Intrapreneurial forms and well-being at work
T2 - 12th European Conference on Innovation and Entrepreneurship, ECIE 2017
AU - Georget, Valentine
AU - Rayna, Thierry
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Academic Conferences and Publishing International Limited. All rights reserved.
PY - 2017/1/1
Y1 - 2017/1/1
N2 - Well-being at work is a productivity factor and source of an organization (Boyd, 1997). Organizational structures and employee places evolve, in particular with creative organization apparition (Woodman, Sawyer, and Griffin, 1993). Hence, aim of this exploratory study is to study the impact of management mode of intrapreneurial forms of new organizations, defined by Slevin and Covin (2010), on well-being at work. Slevin & Covin (2010) have defined four intrapreneurial management modes, with two variables : management style (Slevin and Covin, 1990) and organizational structure : mechanistic and organic structure (Slevin and Covin, 1990). We have asked sample of thirteen individual, who were allocated in two groups : Innovation managers and employees. In order to measure well-being at work in two different populations, we have distinguished extrinsic factors of well-being at work (Weiss and al., 1967 ; Donia, Gagné, Houlfort, and Koestner, 2007 ; Biétry and Creusier, 2013) and intrinsic factors of well-being at work (Weiss and al., 1967 ; Donia, Gagné, Houlfort, and Koestner, 2007 ; Biétry and Creusier, 2013). In order to collect data and to attend our purpose, we have used semi-structured interview methodology (Imbert, 2010). According to the different types of entrepreneurial dynamic models, the results show that individual use different factors to explain well-being or ill-being at work.
AB - Well-being at work is a productivity factor and source of an organization (Boyd, 1997). Organizational structures and employee places evolve, in particular with creative organization apparition (Woodman, Sawyer, and Griffin, 1993). Hence, aim of this exploratory study is to study the impact of management mode of intrapreneurial forms of new organizations, defined by Slevin and Covin (2010), on well-being at work. Slevin & Covin (2010) have defined four intrapreneurial management modes, with two variables : management style (Slevin and Covin, 1990) and organizational structure : mechanistic and organic structure (Slevin and Covin, 1990). We have asked sample of thirteen individual, who were allocated in two groups : Innovation managers and employees. In order to measure well-being at work in two different populations, we have distinguished extrinsic factors of well-being at work (Weiss and al., 1967 ; Donia, Gagné, Houlfort, and Koestner, 2007 ; Biétry and Creusier, 2013) and intrinsic factors of well-being at work (Weiss and al., 1967 ; Donia, Gagné, Houlfort, and Koestner, 2007 ; Biétry and Creusier, 2013). In order to collect data and to attend our purpose, we have used semi-structured interview methodology (Imbert, 2010). According to the different types of entrepreneurial dynamic models, the results show that individual use different factors to explain well-being or ill-being at work.
KW - Intrapreneurship
KW - Well-being at work
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85054081468
SN - 9781911218555
T3 - Proceedings of the European Conference on Innovation and Entrepreneurship, ECIE
SP - 696
EP - 705
BT - Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Innovation and Entrepreneurship, ECIE 2017
A2 - Loue, Christophe
A2 - Slimane, Sonia Ben
A2 - Slimane, Sonia Ben
PB - Academic Conferences and Publishing International Limited
Y2 - 21 September 2017 through 22 September 2017
ER -